Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22166255›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2012

Aggressive therapy in patients with early arthritis results in similar outcome compared with conventional care: the STREAM randomized trial.

Izhar C van Eijk, Markus M J Nielen, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma, Gerard J Tijhuis, Maarten Boers, Ben A C Dijkmans, Dirkjan van Schaardenburg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04985435 (Better After CHoosing. Randomly Allocated or Patient Preference Based Treatment With Filgotinib or TNFi in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04985435 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Better After CHoosing. Randomly Allocated or Patient Preference Based Treatment With Filgotinib or TNFi in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (BACH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorR.BosRan2021 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsFilgotinib, Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Drug (Product), 50 patients will have a Free Choice between Filgotinib and anti TNF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Treat-to-target in Behçet syndrome.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Future therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis?Seminars in immunopathology · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Izhar C van EijkJan van Breemen Research Institute/Reade, Dr Jan van Breemenstraat 2, 1056 AB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Markus M J Nielen
Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma
Gerard J Tijhuis
Maarten Boers
Ben A C Dijkmans
Dirkjan van Schaardenburg
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLNational Health Care Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects of aggressive tight control therapy and conventional care on radiographic progression and disease activity in patients with early mild inflammatory arthritis.

methodsPatients with two to five swollen joints, Sharp-van der Heijde radiographic score (SHS) <5 and symptom duration ≤2 years were randomized between two strategies. Patients with a definite non-RA diagnosis were excluded. The protocol of the aggressive group aimed for remission (DAS < 1.6), with consecutive treatment steps: MTX, addition of adalimumab and combination therapy. The conventional care group followed a strategy with traditional DMARDs (no prednisone or biologics) without DAS-based guideline. Outcome measures after 2 years were SHS (primary), remission rate and HAQ score (secondary).

resultsEighty-two patients participated (60% ACPA positive). In the aggressive group (n = 42), 19 patients were treated with adalimumab. In the conventional care group (n = 40), 24 patients started with hydroxychloroquin (HCQ), 2 with sulfasalazine (SSZ) and 14 with MTX. After 2 years, the median SHS increase was 0 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-1.1] and 0.5 (IQR 0-2.5), remission rates were 66 and 49% and HAQ decreased with a mean of -0.09 (0.50) and -0.25 (0.59) in the aggressive and conventional care group, respectively. All comparisons were non-significant.

conclusionIn patients with early arthritis of two to five joints, both aggressive tight-control therapy including adalimumab and conventional therapy resulted in remission rates around 50%, low radiographic damage and excellent functional status after 2 years. However, full disease control including radiographic arrest in all patients remains an elusive target even in moderately active early arthritis. Trial registration. Dutch Trial Register, http://www.trialregister.nl/, NTR 144.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRadiographyRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexAdalimumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexateTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID22166255
PMCPMC3306166
OpenAlexW2154217221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.