Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22166114›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Predicting gene ontology from a global meta-analysis of 1-color microarray experiments.

Mikhail G Dozmorov, Cory B Giles, Jonathan D Wren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains regulate digitation junctions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikhail G DozmorovArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation 825 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104-5005, USA.
Cory B Giles
Jonathan D Wren
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

VALIDATING NOVEL GENES IMPLICATED IN LEUKOCYTE CHEMOTAXISP20RR020143 · NCRR · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI KAUFMAN, KENNETH M · 2004 to 2011
$21.0M
SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI CHAKRAVARTY, ELIZA F · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
Characterization and testing of novel genes in DNA double-strand break repairR21ES019248 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WIESE, CLAUDIA · 2010 to 2011
$473k
NCRR NIH HHS #5P20RR020143NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIEHS NIH HHS #R21ES019248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal meta-analysis (GMA) of microarray data to identify genes with highly similar co-expression profiles is emerging as an accurate method to predict gene function and phenotype, even in the absence of published data on the gene(s) being analyzed. With a third of human genes still uncharacterized, this approach is a promising way to direct experiments and rapidly understand the biological roles of genes. To predict function for genes of interest, GMA relies on a guilt-by-association approach to identify sets of genes with known functions that are consistently co-expressed with it across different experimental conditions, suggesting coordinated regulation for a specific biological purpose. Our goal here is to define how sample, dataset size and ranking parameters affect prediction performance.

results13,000 human 1-color microarrays were downloaded from GEO for GMA analysis. Prediction performance was benchmarked by calculating the distance within the Gene Ontology (GO) tree between predicted function and annotated function for sets of 100 randomly selected genes. We find the number of new predicted functions rises as more datasets are added, but begins to saturate at a sample size of approximately 2,000 experiments. For the gene set used to predict function, we find precision to be higher with smaller set sizes, yet with correspondingly poor recall and, as set size is increased, recall and F-measure also tend to increase but at the cost of precision.

conclusionsOf the 20,813 genes expressed in 50 or more experiments, at least one predicted GO category was found for 72.5% of them. Of the 5,720 genes without GO annotation, 4,189 had at least one predicted ontology using top 40 co-expressed genes for prediction analysis. For the remaining 1,531 genes without GO predictions or annotations, ~17% (257 genes) had sufficient co-expression data yet no statistically significantly overrepresented ontologies, suggesting their regulation may be more complex.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingColorHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22166114
PMCPMC3236836
OpenAlexW2074569757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.