Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22166002›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

High-throughput processing and normalization of one-color microarrays for transcriptional meta-analyses.

Mikhail G Dozmorov, Jonathan D Wren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikhail G DozmorovArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation 825 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104-5005, USA. Mikhail-Dozmorov@omrf.org
Jonathan D Wren
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

VALIDATING NOVEL GENES IMPLICATED IN LEUKOCYTE CHEMOTAXISP20RR020143 · NCRR · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI ALARCON-RIQUELME, MARTA E · 2004 to 2011
$21.0M
SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GUTHRIDGE, JOEL MARVIN · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
Characterization and testing of novel genes in DNA double-strand break repairR21ES019248 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI WIESE, CLAUDIA · 2010 to 2011
$473k
NCRR NIH HHS #5P20RR020143NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIEHS NIH HHS #R21ES019248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroarray experiments are becoming increasingly common in biomedical research, as is their deposition in publicly accessible repositories, such as Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). As such, there has been a surge in interest to use this microarray data for meta-analytic approaches, whether to increase sample size for a more powerful analysis of a specific disease (e.g. lung cancer) or to re-examine experiments for reasons different than those examined in the initial, publishing study that generated them. For the average biomedical researcher, there are a number of practical barriers to conducting such meta-analyses such as manually aggregating, filtering and formatting the data. Methods to automatically process large repositories of microarray data into a standardized, directly comparable format will enable easier and more reliable access to microarray data to conduct meta-analyses.

methodsWe present a straightforward, simple but robust against potential outliers method for automatic quality control and pre-processing of tens of thousands of single-channel microarray data files. GEO GDS files are quality checked by comparing parametric distributions and quantile normalized to enable direct comparison of expression level for subsequent meta-analyses.

results13,000 human 1-color experiments were processed to create a single gene expression matrix that subsets can be extracted from to conduct meta-analyses. Interestingly, we found that when conducting a global meta-analysis of gene-gene co-expression patterns across all 13,000 experiments to predict gene function, normalization had minimal improvement over using the raw data.

conclusionsNormalization of microarray data appears to be of minimal importance on analyses based on co-expression patterns when the sample size is on the order of thousands microarray datasets. Smaller subsets, however, are more prone to aberrations and artefacts, and effective means of automating normalization procedures not only empowers meta-analytic approaches, but aids in reproducibility by providing a standard way of approaching the problem.Data availability: matrix containing normalized expression of 20,813 genes across 13,000 experiments is available for download at . Source code for GDS files pre-processing is available from the authors upon request.

Indexed as

SoftwareDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsSample Size

Identifiers

PMID22166002
PMCPMC3236842
OpenAlexW2141069903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.