Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22164203›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Perspectives on the use of multiple sclerosis risk genes for prediction.

Naghmeh Jafari, Linda Broer, Cornelia M van Duijn, A Cecile J W Janssens, Rogier Q Hintzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013
    Review
  9. Burden of genetic risk variants in multiple sclerosis families in the Netherlands.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naghmeh JafariDepartment of Neurology, ErasMS Center, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda Broer
Cornelia M van Duijn
A Cecile J W Janssens
Rogier Q Hintzen
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA recent collaborative genome-wide association study replicated a large number of susceptibility loci and identified novel loci. This increase in known multiple sclerosis (MS) risk genes raises questions about clinical applicability of genotyping. In an empirical set we assessed the predictive power of typing multiple genes. Next, in a modelling study we explored current and potential predictive performance of genetic MS risk models. MATERIALS AND

methodsGenotype data on 6 MS risk genes in 591 MS patients and 600 controls were used to investigate the predictive value of combining risk alleles. Next, the replicated and novel MS risk loci from the recent and largest international genome-wide association study were used to construct genetic risk models simulating a population of 100,000 individuals. Finally, we assessed the required numbers, frequencies, and ORs of risk SNPs for higher discriminative accuracy in the future.

resultsIndividuals with 10 to 12 risk alleles had a significantly increased risk compared to individuals with the average population risk for developing MS (OR 2.76 (95% CI 2.02-3.77)). In the simulation study we showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a risk score based on the 6 SNPs was 0.64. The AUC increases to 0.66 using the well replicated 24 SNPs and to 0.69 when including all replicated and novel SNPs (n = 53) in the risk model. An additional 20 SNPs with allele frequency 0.30 and ORs 1.1 would be needed to increase the AUC to a slightly higher level of 0.70, and at least 50 novel variants with allele frequency 0.30 and ORs 1.4 would be needed to obtain an AUC of 0.85.

conclusionAlthough new MS risk SNPs emerge rapidly, the discriminatory ability in a clinical setting will be limited.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedArea Under CurveCase-Control StudiesCD58 AntigensCell Cycle ProteinsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeGTPase-Activating ProteinsHLA-DRB1 ChainsHumansInterleukin-17Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitCD58 AntigensCell Cycle ProteinsCLEC16A protein, humanEVI5 protein, humanGTPase-Activating ProteinsHLA-DRB1 ChainsIl17a protein, ratIL2RA protein, humanInterleukin-17Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitLectins, C-TypeMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsNuclear ProteinsReceptors, Interleukin-7

Identifiers

PMID22164203
PMCPMC3229479
OpenAlexW2171600841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.