ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2011
Graspable objects shape number processing.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceiving object dangerousness: an escape from pain?Experimental brain research · 2013Trial
- Number-action coupling across the lifespan: Sensorimotor foundations of numerical cognition.iScience · 2026Review
- Object numerosity influence sensorimotor programs evoked by graspable object nouns.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Open hands, large numbers: manual gestures influence random number generation.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Effects of short-term hand immobilization on anticipatory mechanism for tool use.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Near-optimal integration of the magnitude information of time and numerosity.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Multi-dimensional sensorimotor grounding of concrete and abstract categories.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Selective interference of hand posture with grasping capability estimation.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Influences of hand action on the processing of symbolic numbers: A special role of pointing?PloS one · 2022Article
- More Thumbs Than Rules: Is Rationality an Exaptation?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- From Affordances to Abstract Words: The Flexibility of Sensorimotor Grounding.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Finger-Counting and Numerical Structure.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Tool-number interaction during a prospective memory task.Cognitive processing · 2020Article
- The Force of Numbers: Investigating Manual Signatures of Embodied Number Processing.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- Finger posing primes number comprehension.Cognitive processing · 2017Article
- Creating semantics in tool use.Cognitive processing · 2017Article
- Influence of finger and mouth action observation on random number generation: an instance of embodied cognition for abstract concepts.Psychological research · 2017Article
- Commentary: From 'sense of number' to 'sense of magnitude' - The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space.Psychological research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of numerical cognition represents an interesting case for action-based theories of cognition, since number is a special kind of abstract concept. Several studies have shown that within the parietal lobes adjacent neural regions code numerical magnitude and grasping-related information. This anatomical proximity between brain areas involved in number and sensorimotor processes may account for interactions between numerical magnitude and action. In particular, recent studies have demonstrated a causal role of action perception on numerical magnitude processing. If objects are represented in terms of actions (affordances), the causal role of action on number processing should extend to the case of objects affordances. This study investigates the relationship between numbers and objects affordances in two experiments, without (Experiment 1) or with (Experiment 2) the requirement of an action (i.e., participants were asked to hold an object in their hands during the task). The task consisted in repeating aloud the odd or even digit within a pair depending on the type of the preceding or following object. Order of presentation (object-number vs. number-object), Object type (graspable vs. ungraspable), Object size (small vs. large), and Numerical magnitude (small vs. large) were manipulated for each experiment. Experiment 1 showed a facilitation - in terms of quicker responses - for graspable over ungraspable objects preceded by numbers, and an effect of numerical magnitude after the presentation of graspable objects. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the action execution enhanced overall the sensitivity to numerical magnitude, and that at the same time it interfered with the effects of objects affordances on number processing. Overall, these findings demonstrate that numbers and graspable objects are strongly interrelated, supporting the view that abstract concepts may be grounded in the motor experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.