Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22163280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Genome-scale screen for DNA methylation-based detection markers for ovarian cancer.

Mihaela Campan, Melissa Moffitt, Sahar Houshdaran, Hui Shen, Martin Widschwendter, Günter Daxenbichler, Tiffany Long, Christian Marth, Ite A Laird-Offringa, Michael F Press and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mihaela CampanDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Melissa Moffitt
Sahar Houshdaran
Hui Shen
Martin Widschwendter
Günter Daxenbichler
Tiffany Long
Christian Marth
Ite A Laird-Offringa
Michael F Press
Louis Dubeau
Kimberly D Siegmund
Anna H Wu
Susan Groshen
Uma Chandavarkar
Lynda D Roman
Andrew Berchuck
Celeste L Pearce
Peter W Laird
University of Southern California · USSouthern California University for Professional Studies · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATDuke University · USUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

DNA Methylation Markers in Ovarian CancerR01CA096958 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LAIRD, PETER W · 2002 to 2006
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096958NCI NIH HHS R01-CA096958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of sensitive biomarkers for the detection of ovarian cancer is of high clinical relevance for early detection and/or monitoring of disease recurrence. We developed a systematic multi-step biomarker discovery and verification strategy to identify candidate DNA methylation markers for the blood-based detection of ovarian cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe used the Illumina Infinium platform to analyze the DNA methylation status of 27,578 CpG sites in 41 ovarian tumors. We employed a marker selection strategy that emphasized sensitivity by requiring consistency of methylation across tumors, while achieving specificity by excluding markers with methylation in control leukocyte or serum DNA. Our verification strategy involved testing the ability of identified markers to monitor disease burden in serially collected serum samples from ovarian cancer patients who had undergone surgical tumor resection compared to CA-125 levels. We identified one marker, IFFO1 promoter methylation (IFFO1-M), that is frequently methylated in ovarian tumors and that is rarely detected in the blood of normal controls. When tested in 127 serially collected sera from ovarian cancer patients, IFFO1-M showed post-resection kinetics significantly correlated with serum CA-125 measurements in six out of 16 patients. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We implemented an effective marker screening and verification strategy, leading to the identification of IFFO1-M as a blood-based candidate marker for sensitive detection of ovarian cancer. Serum levels of IFFO1-M displayed post-resection kinetics consistent with a reflection of disease burden. We anticipate that IFFO1-M and other candidate markers emerging from this marker development pipeline may provide disease detection capabilities that complement existing biomarkers.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorBlood CoagulationCA-125 AntigenCpG IslandsDNAEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansKineticsLongitudinal StudiesOdds RatioOvarian NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenDNA

Identifiers

PMID22163280
PMCPMC3233546
OpenAlexW1978241371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.