ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2011
Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial HIV treatment under Italian guidelines.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceived satisfaction with HIV care and its impact on medication adherence and clinical outcomes: a cross-sectional study in Kumasi, Ghana.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Modeling the Public Health Impact of Improved Antiretroviral Therapy Restart Patterns Among People with HIV Who Have Discontinued Treatment.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Assessing the Benefits of Rapid Start Antiretroviral Therapy for Newly Diagnosed People with HIV in the United States.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting.PloS one · 2022Article
- Safety and effectiveness of switching to Abacavir/Lamivudine plus rilpivirine for maintenance therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-1 individuals in Singapore (SEALS).AIDS research and therapy · 2021Article
- Early Treatment in HIV Patients: A Cost-Utility Analysis from the Italian Perspective.Clinical drug investigation · 2016Article
- HIV-positive patients' perceptions of care received at a selected antiretroviral therapy clinic in Vhembe district, South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2016Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Single- Versus Generic Multiple-Tablet Regimens for Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in the United States.PloS one · 2016Article
- A narrative review of cost-effectiveness analysis of people living with HIV treated with HAART: from interventions to outcomes.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2015Review
- Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir combination antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection in Canada.PharmacoEconomics · 2014Article
- Cost analysis of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens for managing human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients according to clinical practice in a hospital setting.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2014Article
- A methodological review of models used to estimate the cost effectiveness of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV infection.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Review
- Economic evaluation of initial antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients: an update of Italian guidelines.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2013Review
- Antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients: a proposal to assess the economic value of the single-tablet regimen.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2013Article
- Triple-combination rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir (Complera™/Eviplera™) in the treatment of HIV infection.Patient preference and adherence · 2013Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of HIV treatment in the clinical practice of a public hospital in northern Italy.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2012Article
- Lower healthcare costs associated with the use of a single-pill ARV regimen in the UK, 2004-2008.PloS one · 2012Article
- Controlling the HIV/AIDS epidemic: current status and global challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSince the mid-1990s, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has modified the clinical course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, reducing the rate of disease progression, the incidence of opportunistic infections, and mortality. The authors of this paper performed an economic analysis to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the HAART regimens in Italy for managing HIV-infected patients according to national guidelines. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out by means of a Markov model, which through a decision-analytic approach, made it possible to compare the studied antiretroviral regimens. The population considered in the model consisted of adult subjects with HIV who received antiretroviral HAART treatment for the first time. The population considered in the analysis reflects the patients' characteristics according to one of the regional surveillance systems HIV/AIDS infection report currently operating in Italy. The analysis was carried out from the point of view of the Italian health care system. The considered outcome measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct health costs calculated for the year 2010. Both the outcomes (QALYs) and the costs were discounted by 3.5%. The time horizon adopted in the model was 10 years.
resultsThe model shows, in terms of cost per gained QALY, single tablet regimen (STR) appeared to be the most cost-effective therapeutic choice (€22,017), followed by tenofovir (TDF) + lamivudine + efavirenz (EFV) (€24,526), and TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) + nevirapine (€26,416), and TDF + FTC + EFV (€26,558); the remaining strategies have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) value varying from €28,000 to €41,000 per QALY. The sensitivity analysis on the main variables confirmed the validity of the base case scenario.
conclusionSTR is the most cost-effective treatment strategy, compared with the other therapeutic regimens recommended by the Italian guidelines. All the ICER values of the various regimens considered by the Italian guidelines were lower than the threshold value of €50,000 commonly accepted at the international level. The model developed represents a tool for policy makers and health care professionals to make short- and long-term cost projections and thus evaluate their impact on the available budgets for HIV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.