Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22163122›Full record

ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2011

Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents.

Josip Tambaca, Suncica Canic, Mate Kosor, R David Fish, David Paniagua

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Waves and fluid-solid interaction in stented blood vessels.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018
    Article
  4. Behaviour of two typical stents towards a new stent evolution.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josip TambacaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia.
Suncica Canic
Mate Kosor
R David Fish
David Paniagua
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of endovascular coronary stents influences their therapeutic efficacy. Through computational studies, researchers can analyze device performance and improve designs. We developed a 1-dimensional finite element method, net-based algorithm and used it to analyze the effects of radial loading and bending in commercially available stents. Our computational study included designs modeled on the Express, Cypher, Xience, and Palmaz stents.We found that stents that did not fully expand were less rigid than the fully expanded stents and, therefore, exhibited larger displacement. Stents with an open-cell design, such as Express-like or Xience-like stents, had a higher bending flexibility. Stents with in-phase circumferential rings, such as the Xience-like stent, had the smallest longitudinal extension when exposed to radial compression forces. Thus, the open-cell model that had in-phase circumferential rings connected by straight horizontal struts exhibited radial stiffness, bending flexibility, and the smallest change in stent length during radial forcing. The Palmaz-like stent was the most rigid of all. These findings are supported by clinical experience.Computer simulations of the mechanical properties of endovascular stents offer sophisticated insights into the mechanical behavior of different stent designs and should be used whenever possible to help physicians decide which stent is best for treating a given lesion. Our 1-dimensional finite element method model is incomparably simpler, faster, and more accurate than the classical 3-dimensional approaches. It can facilitate stent design and may aid in stent selection in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, TheoreticalProsthesis DesignStentsAlgorithmsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery DiseaseFinite Element AnalysisHumansPatient SelectionProsthesis FailureStress, MechanicalComputer simulationcoronary artery diseasecoronary restenosisfinite element analysismaterials testingmathematical modelstentsstress, mechanical

Identifiers

PMID22163122
PMCPMC3231552
OpenAlexW2120992667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.