ArticleTexas Heart Institute journal2011
Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents.
Article in Texas Heart Institute journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Innovative Stereolithography 3D Tubular Method for Ultrathin Polymeric Stent Manufacture: The Effect of Process Parameters.Polymers · 2023Article
- Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Ruptured Plaques in Native Arteries and Neoatherosclerotic Segments: An OCT-Based and Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Waves and fluid-solid interaction in stented blood vessels.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018Article
- Behaviour of two typical stents towards a new stent evolution.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2017Article
- In vivo degradation of copolymers prepared from L-lactide, 1,3-trimethylene carbonate and glycolide as coronary stent materials.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2015Article
- Study of the behavior of a bell-shaped colonic self-expandable NiTi stent under peristaltic movements.BioMed research international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical behavior of endovascular coronary stents influences their therapeutic efficacy. Through computational studies, researchers can analyze device performance and improve designs. We developed a 1-dimensional finite element method, net-based algorithm and used it to analyze the effects of radial loading and bending in commercially available stents. Our computational study included designs modeled on the Express, Cypher, Xience, and Palmaz stents.We found that stents that did not fully expand were less rigid than the fully expanded stents and, therefore, exhibited larger displacement. Stents with an open-cell design, such as Express-like or Xience-like stents, had a higher bending flexibility. Stents with in-phase circumferential rings, such as the Xience-like stent, had the smallest longitudinal extension when exposed to radial compression forces. Thus, the open-cell model that had in-phase circumferential rings connected by straight horizontal struts exhibited radial stiffness, bending flexibility, and the smallest change in stent length during radial forcing. The Palmaz-like stent was the most rigid of all. These findings are supported by clinical experience.Computer simulations of the mechanical properties of endovascular stents offer sophisticated insights into the mechanical behavior of different stent designs and should be used whenever possible to help physicians decide which stent is best for treating a given lesion. Our 1-dimensional finite element method model is incomparably simpler, faster, and more accurate than the classical 3-dimensional approaches. It can facilitate stent design and may aid in stent selection in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22163122PMC3231552W2120992667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.