ArticlePloS one2011
DNA damage in plant herbarium tissue.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Historical Plant Embryos as Alternative Sources of Ancient DNA for Whole Genome Sequencing.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- A phylogenetic approach to prioritizing crop wild relatives in Brassiceae (Brassicaceae) for breeding applications.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- A global phylogenetic framework for Diospyros L. (Ebenaceae, Ericales): enhanced taxon and sample coverage through NGS, Sanger sequencing and herbariomics.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Using herbarium collections to study genetic responses to global change.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Extending Specimens to Save Plant DNA: Structuring Department DNA Collections in Times of Biodiversity Loss.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Temporal and spatial shifts in the foliar fungal endophyte community of Norway spruce (Picea abies) over 150 years in Finland.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Patterns of aDNA damage through time and environments-lessons from herbarium specimens.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Mining the past for the future: cyanobacterial herbarium specimens for systematics, evolution, and cyanotoxin diversity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Some light shed onPhytoKeys · 2026Article
- Ancient Microbiomes as Mirrored by DNA Extracted From Century-Old Herbarium Plants and Associated Soil.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Museum Genomics Reveals Temporal Genetic Stasis and Global Genetic Diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- A Post-Mortem Molecular Damage Profile in the Ancient Human Mitochondrial DNA.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- A ribodepletion and tagging protocol to multiplex samples for RNA-seq based virus detection: application to the cassava virome.Virology journal · 2025Article
- Geographical-Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important FamilyBiology · 2024Article
- The sweet tabaiba or there and back again: phylogeographical history of the Macaronesian Euphorbia balsamifera.Annals of botany · 2024Article
- Assessing the effect of sample storage time on viral detection using a rapid and cost-effective CTAB-based extraction method.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Paleomicrobiology: Tracking the past microbial life from single species to entire microbial communities.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Bacterial phylotypes associated with rock-dwellingPolar biology · 2024Article
- From Dormant Collections to Repositories for the Study of Habitat Changes: The Importance of Herbaria in Modern Life Sciences.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Retrieval of long DNA reads from herbarium specimens.AoB PLANTS · 2023Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dried plant herbarium specimens are potentially a valuable source of DNA. Efforts to obtain genetic information from this source are often hindered by an inability to obtain amplifiable DNA as herbarium DNA is typically highly degraded. DNA post-mortem damage may not only reduce the number of amplifiable template molecules, but may also lead to the generation of erroneous sequence information. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of DNA post-mortem damage is essential to determine the accuracy of molecular data from herbarium specimens. In this study we present an assessment of DNA damage as miscoding lesions in herbarium specimens using 454-sequencing of amplicons derived from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear DNA. In addition, we assess DNA degradation as a result of strand breaks and other types of polymerase non-bypassable damage by quantitative real-time PCR. Comparing four pairs of fresh and herbarium specimens of the same individuals we quantitatively assess post-mortem DNA damage, directly after specimen preparation, as well as after long-term herbarium storage. After specimen preparation we estimate the proportion of gene copy numbers of plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear DNA to be 2.4-3.8% of fresh control DNA and 1.0-1.3% after long-term herbarium storage, indicating that nearly all DNA damage occurs on specimen preparation. In addition, there is no evidence of preferential degradation of organelle versus nuclear genomes. Increased levels of C→T/G→A transitions were observed in old herbarium plastid DNA, representing 21.8% of observed miscoding lesions. We interpret this type of post-mortem DNA damage-derived modification to have arisen from the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine during long-term herbarium storage. Our results suggest that reliable sequence data can be obtained from herbarium specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.