Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22162957›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

A tale of two stories: astrocyte regulation of synaptic depression and facilitation.

Maurizio De Pittà, Vladislav Volman, Hugues Berry, Eshel Ben-Jacob

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ventral striatal astrocytes contribute to reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. ACognitive neurodynamics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuron-Glia Interactions and Brain Circuits.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Glia as sculptors of synaptic plasticity.Neuroscience research · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maurizio De PittàSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Vladislav Volman
Hugues Berry
Eshel Ben-Jacob
Tel Aviv University · ILCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics · USLaboratoire d'Informatique en Images et Systèmes d'Information · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term presynaptic plasticity designates variations of the amplitude of synaptic information transfer whereby the amount of neurotransmitter released upon presynaptic stimulation changes over seconds as a function of the neuronal firing activity. While a consensus has emerged that the resulting decrease (depression) and/or increase (facilitation) of the synapse strength are crucial to neuronal computations, their modes of expression in vivo remain unclear. Recent experimental studies have reported that glial cells, particularly astrocytes in the hippocampus, are able to modulate short-term plasticity but the mechanism of such a modulation is poorly understood. Here, we investigate the characteristics of short-term plasticity modulation by astrocytes using a biophysically realistic computational model. Mean-field analysis of the model, supported by intensive numerical simulations, unravels that astrocytes may mediate counterintuitive effects. Depending on the expressed presynaptic signaling pathways, astrocytes may globally inhibit or potentiate the synapse: the amount of released neurotransmitter in the presence of the astrocyte is transiently smaller or larger than in its absence. But this global effect usually coexists with the opposite local effect on paired pulses: with release-decreasing astrocytes most paired pulses become facilitated, namely the amount of neurotransmitter released upon spike i+1 is larger than that at spike i, while paired-pulse depression becomes prominent under release-increasing astrocytes. Moreover, we show that the frequency of astrocytic intracellular Ca(2+) oscillations controls the effects of the astrocyte on short-term synaptic plasticity. Our model explains several experimental observations yet unsolved, and uncovers astrocytic gliotransmission as a possible transient switch between short-term paired-pulse depression and facilitation. This possibility has deep implications on the processing of neuronal spikes and resulting information transfer at synapses.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAstrocytesCalciumHippocampusNeuronal PlasticityNeurotransmitter AgentsSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionCalciumNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID22162957
PMCPMC3228793
OpenAlexW2045465808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.