Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22162778›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Substrate adhesion regulates sealing zone architecture and dynamics in cultured osteoclasts.

Fabian Anderegg, Dafna Geblinger, Peter Horvath, Mirren Charnley, Marcus Textor, Lia Addadi, Benjamin Geiger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamics of the sealing zone in cultured osteoclasts.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabian AndereggLaboratory for Surface Science and Technology, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dafna Geblinger
Peter Horvath
Mirren Charnley
Marcus Textor
Lia Addadi
Benjamin Geiger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bone-degrading activity of osteoclasts depends on the formation of a cytoskeletal-adhesive super-structure known as the sealing zone (SZ). The SZ is a dynamic structure, consisting of a condensed array of podosomes, the elementary adhesion-mediating structures of osteoclasts, interconnected by F-actin filaments. The molecular composition and structure of the SZ were extensively investigated, yet despite its major importance for bone formation and remodelling, the mechanisms underlying its assembly and dynamics are still poorly understood. Here we determine the relations between matrix adhesiveness and the formation, stability and expansion of the SZ. By growing differentiated osteoclasts on micro-patterned glass substrates, where adhesive areas are separated by non-adhesive PLL-g-PEG barriers, we show that SZ growth and fusion strictly depend on the continuity of substrate adhesiveness, at the micrometer scale. We present a possible model for the role of mechanical forces in SZ formation and reorganization, inspired by the current data.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsBone and BonesCell AdhesionCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineCells, CulturedCytoskeletonGlassImmunohistochemistryMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, VideoOsteoclastsPolyethylene GlycolsPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysinepolylysine-graft-(poly(ethylene glycol))VinculinVitronectin

Identifiers

PMID22162778
PMCPMC3230604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.