Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22162744›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2011

Progress in the development of new therapies for herpesvirus infections.

Nathan B Price, Mark N Prichard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Herpes simplex viruses: mechanisms of DNA replication.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan B PriceDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233-1711, USA.
Mark N Prichard
University of Alabama · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201100001CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201100001GNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201100010CNIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030049PHS HHS HHSN2722011000010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurgent interest in antiviral drugs for the treatment of herpesvirus has led to the development of new compounds that are progressing through clinical trials. This is important because there are few therapeutic options for resistant infections and some viruses such as human cytomegalovirus remain underserved. New compounds include conventional DNA polymerase inhibitors such as valomaciclovir and cyclopropavir, as well as CMX001 that has a broad spectrum of antiviral activity that includes all the herpesviruses. It also includes compounds with new molecular targets such as maribavir (MBV), FV-100, AIC361, and AIC246. Recent advances with each of these compounds will be reviewed including their virus specificity, mechanism of action, and stage of development. The potential of these new compounds to improve clinical outcome will also be discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHerpesviridaeHerpesviridae InfectionsHumansAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22162744
PMCPMC3230035
OpenAlexW2021604878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.