Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22162623›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2011

Next-generation sequencing facilitates quantitative analysis of wild-type and Nrl(-/-) retinal transcriptomes.

Matthew J Brooks, Harsha K Rajasimha, Jerome E Roger, Anand Swaroop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TheBiomolecules · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Dark continuous noise from mutant G90D-rhodopsin predominantly underlies congenital stationary night blindness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome-Wide Analysis of Aux/IAA Gene Family inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative BONCAT Allows Identification of Newly Synthesized Proteins after Optic Nerve Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome-Wide Identification of LRR-RLK Family inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  15. MutatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Enhancer transcription identifiesDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew J BrooksNeurobiology-Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Harsha K Rajasimha
Jerome E Roger
Anand Swaroop

Funding

Regulation of retinal developmentZIAEY000450 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI SWAROOP, ANAND · 2009 to 2025
$71.0M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNext-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized systems-based analysis of cellular pathways. The goals of this study are to compare NGS-derived retinal transcriptome profiling (RNA-seq) to microarray and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) methods and to evaluate protocols for optimal high-throughput data analysis.

methodsRetinal mRNA profiles of 21-day-old wild-type (WT) and neural retina leucine zipper knockout (Nrl(-/-)) mice were generated by deep sequencing, in triplicate, using Illumina GAIIx. The sequence reads that passed quality filters were analyzed at the transcript isoform level with two methods: Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) followed by ANOVA (ANOVA) and TopHat followed by Cufflinks. qRT-PCR validation was performed using TaqMan and SYBR Green assays.

resultsUsing an optimized data analysis workflow, we mapped about 30 million sequence reads per sample to the mouse genome (build mm9) and identified 16,014 transcripts in the retinas of WT and Nrl(-/-) mice with BWA workflow and 34,115 transcripts with TopHat workflow. RNA-seq data confirmed stable expression of 25 known housekeeping genes, and 12 of these were validated with qRT-PCR. RNA-seq data had a linear relationship with qRT-PCR for more than four orders of magnitude and a goodness of fit (R(2)) of 0.8798. Approximately 10% of the transcripts showed differential expression between the WT and Nrl(-/-) retina, with a fold change ≥1.5 and p value <0.05. Altered expression of 25 genes was confirmed with qRT-PCR, demonstrating the high degree of sensitivity of the RNA-seq method. Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes uncovered several as yet uncharacterized genes that may contribute to retinal function. Data analysis with BWA and TopHat workflows revealed a significant overlap yet provided complementary insights in transcriptome profiling.

conclusionsOur study represents the first detailed analysis of retinal transcriptomes, with biologic replicates, generated by RNA-seq technology. The optimized data analysis workflows reported here should provide a framework for comparative investigations of expression profiles. Our results show that NGS offers a comprehensive and more accurate quantitative and qualitative evaluation of mRNA content within a cell or tissue. We conclude that RNA-seq based transcriptome characterization would expedite genetic network analyses and permit the dissection of complex biologic functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsComparative Genomic HybridizationEye ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMiceMice, KnockoutOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein IsoformsRetinaReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNABasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsEye ProteinsNrl protein, mouseProtein IsoformsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22162623
PMCPMC3233386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.