Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22162584›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2012

Familial aggregation of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Lynn R Goldin, Sigurdur Y Kristinsson, Xueying Sharon Liang, Asa R Derolf, Ola Landgren, Magnus Björkholm

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Familial leukemias.Current treatment options in oncology · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Inherited predisposition to myeloproliferative neoplasms.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynn R GoldinGenetic Epidemiology Branch, DCEG, NCI, 6120 Executive Blvd, Room 7124, MSC 7236, Bethesda, MD 20892-7236, USA. goldinl@mail.nih.gov
Sigurdur Y Kristinsson
Xueying Sharon Liang
Asa R Derolf
Ola Landgren
Magnus Björkholm
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Family Studies ZIACP004410 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SAVAGE, SHARON A. · 2009 to 2025
$56.1M
Genetic EpidemiologyZIACP005803 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GOLDSTEIN, ALISA · 2009 to 2025
$24.8M
STUDIES OF PERSONS AT HIGH RISK OF CANCER--GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGYZ01CP004410 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI TUCKER, MARGARET · 1985 to 2008
$15.0M
CLINICAL/IMMUNOLOGIC/GENETIC ANALYSES OF AUTOIMMUNE LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE SYNDROMEZ01AI000732 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI RAO, VEMULKONDA · 1995 to 2008
$1.1M
Population based studiesZIABC011205 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LANDGREN, OLA · 2009 to 2014
$858k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP004410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeApart from rare pedigrees with multiple cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there is limited data on familial aggregation of AML and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in the population. PATIENTS AND

methodsSwedish population-based registry data were used to evaluate risk of AML, MDS, and other malignancies among 24,573 first-degree relatives of 6,962 patients with AML and 1,388 patients with MDS compared with 106,224 first-degree relatives of matched controls. We used a marginal survival model to calculate familial aggregation.

resultsAML and/or MDS did not aggregate significantly in relatives of patients with AML. There was a modest risk ratio (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.8) in myeloproliferative/myeloid malignancies combined. The risks for any hematologic or any solid tumor were modestly but significantly increased. Relatives of patients with MDS did not show an increased risk for any hematologic tumors. In contrast, we found a significantly increased risk (RR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 38.0) of AML/MDS and of all myeloid malignancies combined (RR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 9.8) among relatives of patients diagnosed at younger than age 21 years.

conclusionWe did not find evidence for familial aggregation of the severe end of the spectrum of myeloid malignancies (AML and MDS). The risks of myeloproliferative neoplasms were modestly increased with trends toward significance, suggesting a possible role of inheritance. In contrast, although limited in sample size, relatives of young patients with AML were at increased risk of AML/MDS, suggesting that germline genes may play a stronger role in these patients. The increased risk of all hematologic malignancies and of solid tumors among relatives of patients with AML suggests that genes for malignancy in general and/or other environmental factors may be shared.

Indexed as

AgedFamily HealthFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesPedigreeRisk FactorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID22162584
PMCPMC3255562
OpenAlexW2142382313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.