Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22162560›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Clinical significance of quantifying Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA by using real-time PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients.

Françoise Botterel, Odile Cabaret, Françoise Foulet, Catherine Cordonnier, Jean-Marc Costa, Stéphane Bretagne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the ELITe InGenius PCR assay compared with immunofluorescence for Pneumocystis jirovecii detection in respiratory samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative real time PCR for distinction betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Is It Possible to DifferentiateJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative PCR to Discriminate BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ability of quantitative PCR to discriminateJournal of medical microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Clinical Performance of (1,3) Beta-D Glucan for the Diagnosis of Pneumocystis Pneumonia (PCP) in Cancer Patients Tested With PCP Polymerase Chain Reaction.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Evaluation Between the RealStarAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Françoise BotterelLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Groupe Hospitalier Chenevier-Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France.
Odile Cabaret
Françoise Foulet
Catherine Cordonnier
Jean-Marc Costa
Stéphane Bretagne
Hôpital Albert-Chenevier · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is more sensitive than microscopy for detecting Pneumocystis jirovecii in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. We therefore developed a qPCR assay and compared the results with those of a routine immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and clinical data. The assay included automated DNA extraction, amplification of the mitochondrial large-subunit rRNA gene and an internal control, and quantification of copy numbers with the help of a plasmid clone. We studied 353 consecutive BAL fluids obtained for investigation of unexplained fever and/or pneumonia in 287 immunocompromised patients. No qPCR inhibition was observed. Seventeen (5%) samples were both IFA and qPCR positive, 63 (18%) were IFA negative and qPCR positive, and 273 (77%) were both IFA and qPCR negative. The copy number was significantly higher for IFA-positive/qPCR-positive samples than for IFA-negative/qPCR-positive samples (4.2 ± 1.2 versus 1.1 ± 1.1 log(10) copies/μl; P < 10(-4)). With IFA as the standard, the qPCR assay sensitivity was 100% for ≥2.6 log(10) copies/μl and the specificity was 100% for ≥4 log(10) copies/μl. Since qPCR results were not available at the time of decision-making, these findings did not trigger cotrimoxazole therapy. Patients with systemic inflammatory diseases and IFA-negative/qPCR-positive BAL fluid had a worse 1-year survival rate than those with IFA-negative/qPCR-negative results (P < 10(-3)), in contrast with solid-organ transplant recipients (P = 0.88) and patients with hematological malignancy (P = 0.26). Quantifying P. jirovecii DNA in BAL fluids independently of IFA positivity should be incorporated into the investigation of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. The relevant threshold remains to be determined and may vary according to the underlying disease.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCohort StudiesHumansImmunocompromised HostMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycologyPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia, PneumocystisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22162560
PMCPMC3264196
OpenAlexW2144958130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.