Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22161999›Full record

Trial reportGenetic epidemiology2012

Using the gene ontology to scan multilevel gene sets for associations in genome wide association studies.

Daniel J Schaid, Jason P Sinnwell, Gregory D Jenkins, Shannon K McDonnell, James N Ingle, Michiaki Kubo, Paul E Goss, Joseph P Costantino, D Lawrence Wickerham, Richard M Weinshilboum

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Genetic epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Airway Mucosal Host Defense Is Key to Genomic Regulation of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease Severity.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multiple comparisons in genetic association studies: a hierarchical modeling approach.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel J SchaidDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. schaid@mayo.edu
Jason P Sinnwell
Gregory D Jenkins
Shannon K McDonnell
James N Ingle
Michiaki Kubo
Paul E Goss
Joseph P Costantino
D Lawrence Wickerham
Richard M Weinshilboum

Funding

NSABP Foreign AccrualsU10CA037377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WOLMARK, NORMAN · 1985 to 2014
$116.5M
STUDY TO ASSESS RALOXIFENE FOR PREVENTING BREAST CANCERU10CA069974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COSTANTINO, JOSEPH P. · 1995 to 2013
$62.4M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF PHASE II DRUG METABOLIZING ENZYMESU01GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2000 to 2009
$15.7M
NCIC Foreign AccrualsU10CA077202 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI EISENHAUER, ELIZABETH · 1998 to 2013
$14.6M
Quantitative Methods for Genetic EpidemiologyR01GM065450 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCHAID, DANIEL J. · 2002 to 2020
$5.6M
The Johns Hopkins Folding MeetingR13GM063173 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATTMAN, EATON E · 2001 to 2001
$5k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS P50CA116201NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037377NCI NIH HHS U10 CA069974NCI NIH HHS U10 CA077202NCI NIH HHS U10-CA-37377NCI NIH HHS U10-CA-69974NCI NIH HHS U10CA77202NIGMS NIH HHS GM065450NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065450NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061388NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM61388NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM63173NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM6138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-set analyses have been widely used in gene expression studies, and some of the developed methods have been extended to genome wide association studies (GWAS). Yet, complications due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and variable numbers of SNPs per gene and genes per gene-set, have plagued current approaches, often leading to ad hoc "fixes." To overcome some of the current limitations, we developed a general approach to scan GWAS SNP data for both gene-level and gene-set analyses, building on score statistics for generalized linear models, and taking advantage of the directed acyclic graph structure of the gene ontology when creating gene-sets. However, other types of gene-set structures can be used, such as the popular Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Our approach combines SNPs into genes, and genes into gene-sets, but assures that positive and negative effects of genes on a trait do not cancel. To control for multiple testing of many gene-sets, we use an efficient computational strategy that accounts for LD and provides accurate step-down adjusted P-values for each gene-set. Application of our methods to two different GWAS provide guidance on the potential strengths and weaknesses of our proposed gene-set analyses.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnastrozoleAndrostadienesAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesData MiningFemaleGenome, HumanHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticNitrilesRaloxifene HydrochlorideSoftwareAnastrozoleAndrostadienesAromatase InhibitorsexemestaneNitrilesRaloxifene HydrochlorideTamoxifenTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID22161999
PMCPMC3310255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.