Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22161499›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2012

Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Mario Manto, James M Bower, Adriana Bastos Conforto, José M Delgado-García, Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda, Marcus Gerwig, Christophe Habas, Nobuhiro Hagura, Richard B Ivry, Peter Mariën and 8 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 534 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
534citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

534 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 968 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

474 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Mario MantoUnité d'Etude du Mouvement, FNRS, ULB Erasme, 808 Route de Lennik, Brussels, Belgium. mmanto@ulb.ac.be
James M Bower
Adriana Bastos Conforto
José M Delgado-García
Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda
Marcus Gerwig
Christophe Habas
Nobuhiro Hagura
Richard B Ivry
Peter Mariën
Marco Molinari
Eiichi Naito
Dennis A Nowak
Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib
Denis Pelisson
Claudia D Tesche
Caroline Tilikete
Dagmar Timmann
Hospital São Paulo · BRUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DECentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRErasmus Hospital · BEFondazione Santa Lucia · ITHelios Klinik Kipfenberg · DENational Institute of Information and Communications Technology · JPSorbonne Université · FRThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversidad Pablo de Olavide · ESUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of New Mexico · USZNA Middelheim Hospital · BE

Funding

Functional Domain of the Cerebellum in Motor LearningR01HD060306 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in developing models of cerebellar function in sensorimotor control, as well as in identifying key problems that are the focus of current investigation. In this consensus paper, we discuss the literature on the role of the cerebellar circuitry in motor control, bringing together a range of different viewpoints. The following topics are covered: oculomotor control, classical conditioning (evidence in animals and in humans), cerebellar control of motor speech, control of grip forces, control of voluntary limb movements, timing, sensorimotor synchronization, control of corticomotor excitability, control of movement-related sensory data acquisition, cerebro-cerebellar interaction in visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement, functional neuroimaging studies, and magnetoencephalographic mapping of cortico-cerebellar dynamics. While the field has yet to reach a consensus on the precise role played by the cerebellum in movement control, the literature has witnessed the emergence of broad proposals that address cerebellar function at multiple levels of analysis. This paper highlights the diversity of current opinion, providing a framework for debate and discussion on the role of this quintessential vertebrate structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlinkingCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalEye MovementsHand StrengthHumansKinesthesisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMotor SkillsMovementOculomotor MusclesSensationSpeech

Identifiers

PMID22161499
PMCPMC4347949
OpenAlexW2168529864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.