Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22161376›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Dopamine agonists for the treatment of cocaine dependence.

Laura Amato, Silvia Minozzi, Pier Paolo Pani, Renata Solimini, Simona Vecchi, Piergiorgio Zuccaro, Marina Davoli

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Disulfiram for the treatment of cocaine dependence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dopamine agonists for the treatment of cocaine dependence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Anticonvulsants for cocaine dependence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Antidepressants for cocaine dependence and problematic cocaine use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Sex differences in guanfacine effects on drug craving and stress arousal in cocaine-dependent individuals.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Neural circuitry and mechanisms of waiting impulsivity: relevance to addiction.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Agonist Medications for the Treatment of Cocaine Use Disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Effects of oral and intravenous administration of buspirone on food-cocaine choice in socially housed male cynomolgus monkeys.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Pharmacological strategies for detoxification.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura AmatoDepartment of Epidemiology, ASL RM/E, Via di Santa Costanza, 53, Rome, Italy, 00198.
Silvia Minozzi
Pier Paolo Pani
Renata Solimini
Simona Vecchi
Piergiorgio Zuccaro
Marina Davoli
Association for Symbolic Logic · USIstituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCocaine dependence is a disorder for which no pharmacological treatment of proven efficacy exists, advances in the neurobiology could guide future medication development

objectivesTo investigate the efficacy and acceptability of dopamine agonists alone or in combination with any psychosocial intervention for the treatment of cocaine abuse and dependence SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group (CDAG) Specialized Register, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL, PsycINFO in June 2011 and researchers for unpublished trials SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and controlled clinical trials comparing dopamine agonists alone or associated with psychosocial intervention with placebo, no treatment, other pharmacological interventions DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data MAIN

resultsTwenty three studies, 2066 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Comparing any dopamine agonist versus placebo, placebo performed better for severity of dependence, four studies, 232 participants, SMD 0.43 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.71), depression, five studies, 322 participants, SMD 0.42 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.65) and abstinent at follow up RR 0.57 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.93). No statistically significant different for the other outcomes considered. Comparing amantadine versus placebo, results never gain the statistical significance, but there is a trend in favour of amantadine for dropouts and depression. Results on adverse events and depression, were in favour of placebo although the difference do not reach the statistical significance. Comparing bromocriptine and Ldopa/Carbidopa versus placebo, results never reached statistical significance. Comparing amantadine versus antidepressants, antidepressants performed better for abstinence. The other two outcomes considered did not show statistically significant differences although dropouts and adverse events tended to be more common in the antidepressant group.The quality of evidence, assessed according to GRADE method, may be judged as moderate for the efficacy of any dopamine agonist versus placebo and as moderate to high for amantadine versus placebo and versus antidepressants. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence from randomised controlled trials does not support the use of dopamine agonists for treating cocaine dependence. This absence of evidence may leave to clinicians the alternative of balancing the possible benefits against the potential adverse effects of the treatment. Even the potential benefit of combining a dopamine agonist with a more potent psychosocial intervention which was suggested by the previous Cochrane review (Soares 2003), is not supported by the results of this updated review.

Indexed as

AmantadineBromocriptineCocaine-Related DisordersDepressionDopamine AgonistsHumansLevodopaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAmantadineBromocriptineDopamine AgonistsLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID22161376
OpenAlexW4211135610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.