Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22161363›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term.

Karen Simmer, Sanjay K Patole, Shripada C Rao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Epigenetic Effects of n-3 LCPUFAs: A Role in Pediatric Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Infant formula and neurocognitive outcomes: impact of study end-point selection.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen SimmerNeonatal Care Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women and Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Bagot Road, Subiaco, WA, Australia, 6008.
Sanjay K Patole
Shripada C Rao
King Edward Memorial Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe n-3 and n-6 fatty acids linolenic acid and linoleic acid are precursors of the n-3 and n-6 long chain fatty acids (LCPUFA). Infant formula has historically only contained the precursor fatty acids. Over the last few years, some manufacturers have added LCPUFA to formulae and marketed them as providing an advantage for the development of term infants.

objectivesTo assess whether supplementation of formula with LCPUFA is safe and of benefit to term infants. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, April, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2011), EMBASE (1980 to April 2011), CINAHL (December 1982 to April 2011) and abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research (1980 to 2010). No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi randomised trials comparing LCPUFA supplemented vs. non-supplemented formula milk and with clinical endpoints were reviewed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the guidelines of Cochrane neonatal review group. Data were sought regarding effects on visual acuity, neurodevelopmental outcomes and physical growth. When appropriate, meta-analysis was conducted to provide a pooled estimate of effect. MAIN

resultsTwenty-five randomised studies were identified; fifteen were included (n = 1889) and ten excluded.Visual acuity was assessed by nine studies. Visual evoked potential was used in six studies, two used Teller cards and one used both. Four studies reported beneficial effects while the remaining five did not.Neurodevelopmental outcome was measured by eleven studies. Bayley scales of infant development (BSID) was used in nine studies; only two showed beneficial effects. Meta-analysis did not show significant benefits of supplementation. One study followed the infants up to nine years of age and did not find benefit of supplementation. One study reported better novelty preference measured by Fagan Infant test at nine months. Another study reported better problem solving at 10 months. One study used Brunet and Lezine test to assess the developmental quotient and did not find beneficial effects.Physical growth was measured by thirteen studies; none found beneficial or harmful effects of supplementation. Meta-analysis found that supplemented group may have marginally lower weight at one year of age. AUTHORS'

conclusionsMajority of the RCTS have not shown beneficial effects of LCPUFA supplementation on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of term infants. The beneficial effects on visual acuity have not been consistently demonstrated. Routine supplementation of term infant milk formula with LCPUFA can not be recommended.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaFatty Acids, UnsaturatedGrowthHumansInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTerm BirthVisual AcuityFatty Acids, Unsaturated

Identifiers

PMID22161363
OpenAlexW4236485663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.