ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2012
Design of pharmacokinetic studies for latent covariates.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population pharmacokinetics of sildenafil in extremely premature infants.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Article
- Quantification of the Forgiveness of Drugs to Imperfect Adherence.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2015Article
- Influence of covariate distribution on the predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models in paediatric research.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Latent covariates are covariates that are known to exist but are either observable but unavailable or unobservable at the time of the clinical study. Designs to account for latent covariates must incorporate both uncertainty in the prevalence of the covariate and the data-type of the covariate. The informativeness of the covariate will then depend on whether the covariate data is continuous, ordinal or nominal. In this work we consider designs for latent covariates that may either directly influence the parameter of interest, or indirectly via actions on an observable covariate which then influences the parameter of interest. We consider a motivating example based on the effect of a genetic polymorphism on the influence of a continuous covariate (age) on drug clearance (CL). The polymorphism could take the case of a haplotype with many variant alleles, or a copy number variation in genes with different phenotypic expressions which could be treated as continuous data, or as a bi- or tri-allelic single nucleotide polymorphism that could form either an ordinal or nominal covariate on drug CL. The aim of this study was to investigate designs for clinical studies for latent covariates that accommodate both unknown prevalence and unknown data-type. Initially, the informativeness of a covariate was explored using linear regression assuming the three data-types continuous, ordinal and nominal. The linear covariate model was then considered within a nonlinear mixed effects modelling framework. Two simulation scenarios were considered: (1) the influence of the latent covariate directly on the parameter of interest and (2) the influence of the latent covariate on an observable non-latent continuous covariate, which was assumed to follow a normal or stratified distribution, and the effect of this covariate on the parameter of interest. A power analysis for population PK modelling (1) where the latent covariate had direct influence on the parameter also showed similar behaviour to the linear regression solution. When the influence of the latent covariate was mediated via another observable non-latent continuous covariate, the power for the continuous model was highest but the power of the ordinal model was indistinguishable from that of the nominal model. Stratification of the observable non-latent continuous covariate did not appreciably change the power to identify the latent covariate from that when we assumed the observable covariate conformed to a normal distribution. It was found that parameter estimation is generally at least 1.5 to 7 fold more precise for continuous models than for categorical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22161222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.