Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22160865›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2012

Intraventricular nicardipine for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage related vasospasm: assessment of 90 days outcome.

Na Lu, Daniel Jackson, Sothear Luke, Emir Festic, Ricardo A Hanel, William David Freeman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Intrathecal nicardipine for symptomatic, refractory vasospasm treatment in pediatric patients: a case series.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Na LuClinical Research Internship Study Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Daniel Jackson
Sothear Luke
Emir Festic
Ricardo A Hanel
William David Freeman
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed cerebral arterial vasospasm is one of the leading causes of death and disability after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We evaluated the safety of intraventricular nicardipine (IVN) for vasospasm (VSP) in aSAH patients, and outcomes compared with a control population.

methodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted for aSAH patients treated with IVN at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, from March 2009 to January 2011. Controls were matched by age, gender, and Fisher grade. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of intracranial bleeding and infection. Outcome was measured by Glasgow Outcome Scale at 30 and 90 days. IVN effects on VSP were evaluated by transcranial Doppler (TCD).

resultsThirteen aSAH patients and one arteriovenous malformation (AVM)-related SAH patient received IVN for VSP and were matched with 14 aSAH patients without IVN therapy for a total of 28 cases. Median dose was 4 mg (range 3-7), and median number of doses was seven (range 1-17). Mean flow velocity decreased after IVN (120.2 and 101.6 cm/s-82.0 and 72.8 cm/s, right and left middle cerebral arteries, respectively). No significant difference was seen in clinical outcomes between controls and cases at 30 days (P = 0.443) and 90 days (P = 0.153). There were no incidences of bleeding or infection with 111 nicardipine injections.

conclusionsIVN appears relatively safe and effective in treating VSP by TCD, but there was no difference in clinical outcomes between nicardipine and control patients at 30 and 90 days. In the future, larger studies are needed to evaluate the clinical outcome with IVN.

Indexed as

AdultCalcium Channel BlockersCase-Control StudiesCritical CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, IntraventricularMaleMiddle AgedNicardipineRetrospective StudiesSubarachnoid HemorrhageTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVasospasm, IntracranialCalcium Channel BlockersNicardipine

Identifiers

PMID22160865
OpenAlexW1974485973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.