ReviewEmergency radiology2012
The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Are They Better Than Plastic Stents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Endoscopic transpapillary stent placement in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and disconnected main pancreatic duct syndrome.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Early-phase vascular involvement is associated with acute pancreatitis severity: a magnetic resonance imaging study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Comparison of clinical findings in 293 dogs with suspect acute pancreatitis: Different clinical presentation with left lobe, right lobe or diffuse involvement of the pancreas.Journal of the South African Veterinary Association · 2020Article
- MR imaging for acute pancreatitis: the current status of clinical applications.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Pancreatic necrosis: Complications and changing trend of treatment.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2019Review
- A Case of Spontaneous Intraperitoneal Rupture of an Acute Necrotic Fluid Collection Associated with Necrotizing Pancreatitis.The American journal of case reports · 2019Article
- Diffusion-weighted MRI: new paradigm for the diagnosis of interstitial oedematous pancreatitis.Gland surgery · 2019Article
- Advanced endoscopic interventions on the pancreas and pancreatic ductal system: a primer for radiologists.Insights into imaging · 2019Review
- Endoscopic versus percutaneous management for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- Radiation overexposure from repeated CT scans in young adults with acute abdominal pain.Emergency radiology · 2018Article
- Cross-sectional imaging of common and unusual complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Insights into imaging · 2015Article
- Computed tomographic angiography under sedation in the diagnosis of suspected canine pancreatitis: a pilot study.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2015Article
- Minimally invasive treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2014Review
- Walled-off pancreatic necrosis and other current concepts in the radiological assessment of acute pancreatitis.Radiologia brasileiraReview
- Imaging the posterior mediastinum: a multimodality approach.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)Review
- Comparing EUS-guided lumen-apposing metal stents with and without integrated electrocautery for endoscopic drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- UNDERSTANDING THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS FOR ACUTE PANCREATITIS: CLASSIFICATION OF ATLANTA 2012.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis and description of the various findings in acute pancreatitis is important for treatment. The original Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis sought to create a uniform system for classifying the severity of acute pancreatitis as well as common language to describe the various events that can occur in acute pancreatitis. The goal was to allow accurate communication between physicians using standardized language so correct treatment options could be used. Since that time, advances in the understanding of acute pancreatitis as well as improvements in both interventions and imaging have led to criticisms of the system and its abandonment by physicians. A 2007 revision of the Atlanta classifications sought to address many of these issues. This article will explain the changes to the Atlanta classification system and provide pictorial examples of the findings in acute pancreatitis as described by the Atlanta classification system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22160496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.