ArticleMolecular biology reports2012
Systematic analysis of genomic organization and heterogeneities of miRNA cluster in vertebrates.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of the role of the miR17-92 cluster in BMP9-induced osteoblast lineage commitment.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Article
- Overexpression of miR-20a promotes the progression of osteosarcoma by directly targeting QKI2.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clustering propensity of microRNA genes is a common biological phenomenon in various animal and plant species. To gain novel insight into genomic organization and potential functional heterogeneities of miRNA clusters in vertebrates from a genome scale, we used large scale data and presented a comprehensive analysis to examine various features of genomic organization of miRNA clusters across seven vertebrates by a combination of comparative genomics and bioinformatics approaches. The results of pair-wise distance analysis of same-strand consecutive miRNAs suggested that the fractions of the miRNA gene pairs are higher at relatively short pair-wise distances than those of protein-coding genes and other non-coding RNA genes. Especially relatively small number of miRNAs is more clustered at very short pair-wise distances than expected at random. We further observed significant difference between real miRNA clusters and randomly organized clusters for different aspects, including higher overlap of target genes, fewer seed types and significant enrichment in diseases. However, the extent of these features of clustered miRNAs has a different tendency and largely depends on inter-miRNA distances because of diverse clustering propensity of miRNAs in vertebrates, suggesting that this cooperated function or cooperative effects between miRNAs in clusters perhaps be affected by inter-miRNA distances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22160431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.