ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2012
Age estimation based on a combined arteriosclerotic index.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Traction-separation law parameters for the description of age-related changes in the delamination strength of the human descending thoracic aorta.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a new quantity, the combined arteriosclerotic index (CAI), which is defined as the ratio between the diameter and the longitudinal prestrain of an artery. The longitudinal prestrain has been adopted as the ratio between the in situ length and the excised length of the abdominal aorta, and is a measure of arterial elasticity. During ageing, arteriosclerosis is manifested by the loss of pretension and by enlargement of the diameter of the artery. CAI combines these two effects. A sample of 61 female and 194 male autopsy measurements of human abdominal aortas shows that CAI correlates significantly with chronological age (R = 0.916/0.921; female/male). The sample had the following parameters: age 53 ± 19/48 ± 16 years; diameter of the abdominal aorta 12.4 ± 2.2/13.4 ± 2.1 mm; and longitudinal prestrain 1.13 ± 0.10/1.15 ± 0.10 (mean ± sample standard deviation; female/male). The resulting CAI was 11.2 ± 2.7/11.9 ± 2.6 mm. The classical linear regression model was employed for age estimation by CAI. The model gave a residual standard deviation of 7.6/6.3 years and a 95% prediction interval range of ± 15.4/12.5 years (female/male). A two-sample t-test confirmed that there are significant differences between the female and male population during ageing, reflected by CAI, unlike longitudinal prestrain. It was concluded that CAI is a suitable predictor of age at time of death and is easily obtainable in the autopsy room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22160294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.