Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22160294›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2012

Age estimation based on a combined arteriosclerotic index.

Lukas Horny, Tomas Adamek, Hynek Chlup, Rudolf Zitny

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas HornyFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 4, 166 07, Prague, Czech Republic. Lukas.Horny@fs.cvut.cz
Tomas Adamek
Hynek Chlup
Rudolf Zitny

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a new quantity, the combined arteriosclerotic index (CAI), which is defined as the ratio between the diameter and the longitudinal prestrain of an artery. The longitudinal prestrain has been adopted as the ratio between the in situ length and the excised length of the abdominal aorta, and is a measure of arterial elasticity. During ageing, arteriosclerosis is manifested by the loss of pretension and by enlargement of the diameter of the artery. CAI combines these two effects. A sample of 61 female and 194 male autopsy measurements of human abdominal aortas shows that CAI correlates significantly with chronological age (R = 0.916/0.921; female/male). The sample had the following parameters: age 53 ± 19/48 ± 16 years; diameter of the abdominal aorta 12.4 ± 2.2/13.4 ± 2.1 mm; and longitudinal prestrain 1.13 ± 0.10/1.15 ± 0.10 (mean ± sample standard deviation; female/male). The resulting CAI was 11.2 ± 2.7/11.9 ± 2.6 mm. The classical linear regression model was employed for age estimation by CAI. The model gave a residual standard deviation of 7.6/6.3 years and a 95% prediction interval range of  ± 15.4/12.5 years (female/male). A two-sample t-test confirmed that there are significant differences between the female and male population during ageing, reflected by CAI, unlike longitudinal prestrain. It was concluded that CAI is a suitable predictor of age at time of death and is easily obtainable in the autopsy room.

Indexed as

AdultAgingAorta, AbdominalArteriosclerosisAutopsyCadaverElasticityFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.