ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2012
Modeling the spread of Phytophthora.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We consider a model for the morphology and growth of the fungus-like plant pathogen Phytophthora using the example of Phytophthora plurivora. Here, we are utilizing a correlated random walk describing the density of tips. This random walk incorporates a delay in branching behavior: newly split tips only start to grow after a short while. First, we question the effect of such a delay on the running fronts, for uniform- as well as non-uniform turning kernels. We find that this delay primarily influences the slope of the front and therewith the way of spatial appropriation, and not its velocity. Our theoretical predictions are confirmed by the growth of Phytophthora in concrete experiments performed in Petri dishes. The second question addressed in this paper, concerns the manner tips are interacting, especially the point why tips stop to grow "behind" the interface of the front, respectively in confrontation experiments at the interface between two colonies. The combination of experimental data about the spatially structured time course of the glucose concentration and simulations of a model taking into account both, tips and glucose, reveals that nutrient depletion is most likely the central mechanism of tip interaction and hyphal growth inhibition. We presume that this is the growing mechanism for our kind of Phytophthora in infected plant tissue. Thus, the pathogen will sap its hosts via energy depletion and tissue destruction in infected areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.