Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22159024›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Effect of circadian clock gene mutations on nonvisual photoreception in the mouse.

Leah Owens, Ethan Buhr, Daniel C Tu, Tamara L Lamprecht, Janet Lee, Russell N Van Gelder

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Circadian clock disruption promotes retinal photoreceptor degeneration.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. The Anti-Elixir Triad: Non-Synced Circadian Rhythm, Gut Dysbiosis, and Telomeric Damage.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ocular Clocks: Adapting Mechanisms for Eye Functions and Health.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Review
  12. Differential roles for cryptochromes in the mammalian retinal clock.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah OwensDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ethan Buhr
Daniel C Tu
Tamara L Lamprecht
Janet Lee
Russell N Van Gelder
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Cryptochrome function in non-visual photoreceptionR01EY014988 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VAN GELDER, RUSSELL N · 2003 to 2006
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS P30EY01730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014988NEI NIH HHS R01EY014988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMice lacking rods and cones retain pupillary light reflexes that are mediated by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Melanopsin is necessary and sufficient for this nonvisual photoreception. The mammalian inner retina also expresses the potential blue light photopigments cryptochromes 1 and 2. Previous studies have shown that outer retinal degenerate mice lacking cryptochromes have lower nonvisual photic sensitivity than retinal degenerate mice, suggesting a role for cryptochrome in inner retinal photoreception.

methodsNonvisual photoreception (pupillary light responses, circadian entrainment, and in vitro sensitivity of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells) were studied in wild-type, rd/rd, and circadian clock-mutant mice with and without rd/rd mutation.

resultsLoss of cryptochrome in retinal degenerate mice reduces the sensitivity of the pupillary light response at all wavelengths but does not alter the form of the action spectrum, suggesting that cryptochrome does not function as a photopigment in the inner retina. The authors compounded the rd/rd retinal degeneration mutation with mutations in other essential circadian clock genes, mPeriod and Bmal1. Both mPeriod1⁻/⁻; mPeriod2⁻/⁻;rd/rd and Bmal1⁻/⁻;rd/rd mice showed significantly lower pupillary light sensitivity than rd/rd mice alone. A moderate amplitude (0.5 log) circadian rhythm of pupillary light responsiveness was observed in rd/rd mice. Multielectrode array recordings of ipRGC responses of mCryptochrome1⁻/⁻;mCryptochrome2⁻/⁻ and mPeriod1⁻/⁻;mPeriod2⁻/⁻ mice showed minimal sensitivity decrement compared with wild-type animals. mCryptochrome1⁻/⁻;mCryptochrome2⁻/⁻;rd/rd, mPeriod1⁻/⁻;mPeriod2⁻/⁻;rd/rd and Bmal1⁻/⁻;rd/rd mice all showed comparable weak behavioral synchronization to a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle.

conclusionsThe effect of cryptochrome loss on nonvisual photoreception is due to loss of the circadian clock nonspecifically. The circadian clock modulates the sensitivity of nonvisual photoreception.

Indexed as

AnimalsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmCryptochromesFemaleLightMaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Mutant StrainsMutationPhotic StimulationReflex, PupillaryRetinal DegenerationRetinal Ganglion CellsCry1 protein, mouseCry2 protein, mouseCryptochromes

Identifiers

PMID22159024
PMCPMC3292377
OpenAlexW2034106887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.