ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2012
Determinants of variations in coronary revascularization practices.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative-effectiveness of revascularization versus routine medical therapy for stable ischemic heart disease: a population-based study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Trial
- Association Between Interventional Cardiologist Practice Characteristics, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Use, and Clinical Outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026Observational
- Mortality After Cardiovascular Surgery and Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.CJC open · 2026Article
- Five-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel disease: a national population-based study of regional practice.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Variations of the Extent of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Among Canadian Immigrants.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease Who Were Recommended for But Declined Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Derivation and validation of predictive indices for cardiac readmission after coronary and valvular surgery - A multicenter study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Severity of obstructive coronary artery stenosis after pre-eclampsia.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2023Article
- Association of Race and Ethnicity With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Variations in Coronary Revascularization Practices and Their Effect on Long-Term Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Heart Team Without Borders: Taking the Heart Team Beyond the Institution.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Association Between Sarcopenia and Adverse Events Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.CJC open · 2022Article
- Modifiable Risk Factors and Residual Risk Following Coronary Revascularization: Insights From a Regionalized Dedicated Follow-Up Clinic.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021Article
- Cardiology providers' recommendations for treatments and use of patient decision aids for multivessel coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Impact of surgeon and anaesthesiologist sex on patient outcomes after cardiac surgery: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Model to Predict Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay After Cardiac Surgery.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Comparison of Heart Team vs Interventional Cardiologist Recommendations for the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.JAMA cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ratio of percutaneous coronary interventions to coronary artery bypass graft surgeries (PCI:CABG ratio) varies considerably across hospitals. We conducted a comprehensive study to identify clinical and nonclinical factors associated with variations in the ratio across 17 cardiac centres in the province of Ontario.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we selected a population-based sample of 8972 patients who underwent an index cardiac catheterization between April 2006 and March 2007 at any of 17 hospitals that perform invasive cardiac procedures in the province. We classified the hospitals into four groups by PCI:CABG ratio (low [< 2.0], low-medium [2.0-2.7], medium-high [2.8-3.2] and high [> 3.2]). We explored the relative contribution of patient, physician and hospital factors to variations in the likelihood of patients receiving PCI or CABG surgery within 90 days after the index catheterization.
resultsThe mean PCI:CABG ratio was 2.7 overall. We observed a threefold variation in the ratios across the four hospital ratio groups, from a mean of 1.6 in the lowest ratio group to a mean of 4.6 in the highest ratio group. Patients with single-vessel disease usually received PCI (88.4%-99.0%) and those with left main artery disease usually underwent CABG (80.8%-94.2%), regardless of the hospital's procedure ratio. Variation in the management of patients with non-emergent multivessel disease accounted for most of the variation in the ratios across hospitals. The mode of revascularization largely reflected the recommendation of the physician performing the diagnostic catheterization and was also influenced by the revascularization "culture" at the treating hospital.
interpretationThe physician performing the diagnostic catheterization and the treating hospital were strong independent predictors of the mode of revascularization. Opportunities exist to improve transparency and consistency around the decision-making process for coronary revascularization, most notably among patients with non-emergent multivessel disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.