Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22158053›Full record

ReviewCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2012

Cervical cancer prevention in low- and middle-income countries: feasible, affordable, essential.

Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe, Groesbeck P Parham, Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu, Sten H Vermund

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Significant association between CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphism and cervical neoplasia risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Coculture of tumor organoids with pathogenic microorganisms: a novel system to mimicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The CryoPop study: Screening for high-grade cervical dysplasia in Karnataka, India.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2023
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vikrant V SahasrabuddheVanderbilt Institute for Global Health and Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Groesbeck P Parham
Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu
Sten H Vermund
University Teaching Hospital · ZMUniversity of Zambia · ZMVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical and anal cancersZIACP010124 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI WENTZENSEN, NICOLAS · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Vanderbilt University-CIDRZ AIDS International Training and Research ProgramD43TW001035 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 1998 to 2014
$10.9M
CERVICAL CANCER AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) INFECTIONZ01CP010124 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHIFFMAN, MARK · 1996 to 2008
$3.0M
Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-infected women in IndiaR21CA113465 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 2005 to 2006
$360k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW001035Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010124Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS R21 CA113465NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The annual worldwide burden of the preventable disease cervical cancer is more than 530,000 new cases and 275,000 deaths, with the majority occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where cervical cancer screening and early treatment are uncommon. Widely used in high-income countries, Pap smear (cytology based) screening is expensive and challenging for implementation in LMICs, where lower-cost, effective alternatives such as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and rapid human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening tests offer promise for scaling up prevention services. Integrating HPV screening with VIA in "screen-and-treat-or-refer" programs offers the dual benefits of HPV screening to maximize detection and using VIA to triage for advanced lesions/cancer, as well as a pelvic exam to address other gynecologic issues. A major issue in LMICs is coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HPV, which further increases the risk for cervical cancer and marks a population with perhaps the greatest need of cervical cancer prevention. Public-private partnerships to enhance the availability of cervical cancer prevention services within HIV/AIDS care delivery platforms through initiatives such as Pink Ribbon Red Ribbon present an historic opportunity to expand cervical cancer screening in LMICs.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGlobal HealthHIV InfectionsHumansMedical OncologyPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsPovertyPreventive MedicineRiskUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID22158053
PMCPMC3586242
OpenAlexW2134344993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.