Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22157622›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2012

The importance of 10q status in an outcomes-based comparison between 1p/19q fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite loss of heterozygosity analysis of oligodendrogliomas.

Craig Horbinski, Marina N Nikiforova, Jonathan Hobbs, Stephanie Bortoluzzi, Kathleen Cieply, Sanja Dacic, Ronald L Hamilton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Neuro-Oncology and Radiogenomics: Time to Integrate?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 1p/19q testing has no significance in the workup of glioblastomas.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. How molecular testing can help (and hurt) in the workup of gliomas.American journal of clinical pathology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Craig HorbinskiDepartment of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. craig.horbinski@uky.edu
Marina N Nikiforova
Jonathan Hobbs
Stephanie Bortoluzzi
Kathleen Cieply
Sanja Dacic
Ronald L Hamilton
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

The Significance of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations in GliomasK08CA155764 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HORBINSKI, CRAIG MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$857k
NCI NIH HHS 1K08CA155764-01A1NCI NIH HHS K08 CA155764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1p/19q codeletion is a favorable prognostic marker of oligodendrogliomas. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microsatellite-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) are common methods to test for 1p/19q codeletion, it is unclear which test is better at prognostic stratification. This study analyzed outcomes of 111 oligodendrogliomas with both 1p/19q FISH and LOH done at the time of diagnosis. Overall concordance between the 2 assays was 81.1%. In grade III oligodendrogliomas, LOH was better than FISH at survival stratification (p < 0.0001 for LOH vs p = 0.02 for FISH), although increasing the stringency of FISH interpretation criteria improved concordance and prognostic power. Oligodendrogliomas that were 1p/19q-codeleted by FISH but also had 10q LOH were negative for 1p/19q codeletion by PCR analysis in more than 70% of cases, with very poor survival in the grade III subset. Thus, although PCR-based LOH is a better stratifier of 1p/19q status, FISH still has clinical and prognostic utility, especially if 10q data can be incorporated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19Cohort StudiesFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLoss of HeterozygosityMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedOligodendrogliomaPolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID22157622
PMCPMC3246063
OpenAlexW86703371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.