Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22157110›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2012

Cochlear gene therapy.

Lawrence R Lustig, Omar Akil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Development of in-house genetic screening for pediatric hearing loss.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ototoxicity: A Challenge in Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of audiology & otology · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawrence R LustigDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. llustig@ohns.ucsf.edu
Omar Akil
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Virally Mediated Gene Therapy for Genetic Hearing LossR21DC012118 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUSTIG, LAWRENCE R · 2012 to 2013
$429k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC012118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review highlights recent advances in cochlear gene therapy over the past several years. Cochlear gene therapy has undergone tremendous advances over the past decade. Beginning with some groundbreaking work in 2005 documenting hair cell regeneration using virally mediated delivery of the mouse atonal 1 gene, gene therapy is now being explored as a possible treatment for a variety of causes of hearing loss. RECENT

findingsRecent advances in cochlear gene therapy include improved methods of gene delivery with a better delineation of viral vectors that are suitable for this purpose, additional improvements in hair cell regeneration, and directed research toward autoimmune hearing loss, ototoxicity, spiral ganglion survival, and genetic forms of hearing loss. SUMMARY: If successful, cochlear gene therapy will dramatically alter our ability to treat a variety of forms of acquired and genetic hearing loss.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochleaCochlear DiseasesGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHair Cells, AuditoryHearing LossHumansRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID22157110
PMCPMC3755754
OpenAlexW1969268469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.