Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22156210›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2011

Nascent-seq indicates widespread cotranscriptional pre-mRNA splicing in Drosophila.

Yevgenia L Khodor, Joseph Rodriguez, Katharine C Abruzzi, Chih-Hang Anthony Tang, Michael T Marr, Michael Rosbash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yevgenia L KhodorHoward Hughes Medical Institute, National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.
Joseph Rodriguez
Katharine C Abruzzi
Chih-Hang Anthony Tang
Michael T Marr
Michael Rosbash

Funding

THE MOLECULAR GENETIC BASIS OF SENSORY BEHAVIOR IN DROSOPHILAP01NS044232 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, LESLIE C · 2002 to 2011
$13.2M
GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF REGULATIONT32GM007122 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 1985 to 2020
$7.5M
ORGANIZATION OF YEAST RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN GENESR01GM023549 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI ROSBASH, MICHAEL · 1985 to 2009
$2.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM023549NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM023549NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007122NINDS NIH HHS NS044232NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS044232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of cotranscriptional splicing in Drosophila, we sequenced nascent RNA transcripts from Drosophila S2 cells as well as from Drosophila heads. Eighty-seven percent of the introns assayed manifest >50% cotranscriptional splicing. The remaining 13% are cotranscriptionally spliced poorly or slowly, with ∼3% being almost completely retained in nascent pre-mRNA. Although individual introns showed slight but statistically significant differences in splicing efficiency, similar global levels of splicing were seen from both sources. Importantly, introns with low cotranscriptional splicing efficiencies are present in the same primary transcript with efficiently spliced introns, indicating that splicing is intron-specific. The analysis also indicates that cotranscriptional splicing is less efficient for first introns, longer introns, and introns annotated as alternative. Finally, S2 cells expressing the slow RpII215(C4) mutant show substantially less intron retention than wild-type S2 cells.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingTranscription, GeneticAnimalsDrosophilaIntronsMutationRNA, MessengerRNA PrecursorsRNA, MessengerRNA Precursors

Identifiers

PMID22156210
PMCPMC3243060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.