Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22156038›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2012

Incorporation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data into a simple mathematical model of tumor growth.

N C Atuegwu, D C Colvin, M E Loveless, L Xu, J C Gore, T E Yankeelov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Surrogating tumour cell density in head and neck cancer: [Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Towards integration ofScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

N C AtuegwuInstitute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, USA.
D C Colvin
M E Loveless
L Xu
J C Gore
T E Yankeelov

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jin Chen · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Quantitative MRI for Predicting Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant TherapyU01CA142565 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S., NANDA, RITA · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
MRI Diffusion in Tumors Using Oscillating GradientsR01CA109106 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI XU, JUNZHONG · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
Evaluation and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers of Tumor Response to TreatmentR01CA138599 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCINTYRE, JAMES OLIVER · 2010 to 2015
$2.2M
South-Eastern Center for Imaging Animal Models of CancerU24CA126588 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Assessment of Tumor Early Response to Treatment by Diffusion MRIK25CA168936 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI XU, JUNZHONG · 2013 to 2017
$728k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA138599NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA109106NCI NIH HHS K25 CA168936NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P30 CA68485NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109106NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138599NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142565NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126588PHS HHS 1P50 098131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We build on previous work to show how serial diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) data can be used to estimate proliferation rates in a rat model of brain cancer. Thirteen rats were inoculated intracranially with 9L tumor cells; eight rats were treated with the chemotherapeutic drug 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and five rats were untreated controls. All animals underwent DW-MRI immediately before, one day and three days after treatment. Values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated from the DW-MRI data and then used to estimate the number of cells in each voxel and also for whole tumor regions of interest. The data from the first two imaging time points were then used to estimate the proliferation rate of each tumor. The proliferation rates were used to predict the number of tumor cells at day three, and this was correlated with the corresponding experimental data. The voxel-by-voxel analysis yielded Pearson’s correlation coefficients ranging from −0.06 to 0.65, whereas the region of interest analysis provided Pearson’s and concordance correlation coefficients of 0.88 and 0.80, respectively. Additionally, the ratio of positive to negative proliferation values was used to separate the treated and control animals (p <0.05) at an earlier point than the mean ADC values. These results further illustrate how quantitative measurements of tumor state obtained non-invasively by imaging can be incorporated into mathematical models that predict tumor growth.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGlioblastomaMaleRatsRats, Inbred F344Treatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22156038
PMCPMC3489059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.