Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22155947›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

M(3): an improved SNP calling algorithm for Illumina BeadArray data.

Gengxin Li, Joel Gelernter, Henry R Kranzler, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gengxin LiBiostatistics Division, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Joel Gelernter
Henry R Kranzler
Hongyu Zhao

Funding

Sex-specific analysis of opioid dependence GWAS and beyondR01DA012690 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2000 to 2017
$14.0M
GENETICS OF COCAINE DEPENDENCER01DA012849 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 1999 to 2010
$11.5M
Linkage Disequilibrium Studies of Alcohol DependenceR01AA011330 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 1997 to 2013
$6.4M
Genomewide Association Study of Cocaine Dependence in two PopulationsRC2DA028909 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2009 to 2010
$4.2M
STATISTICAL METHODS TO MAP GENES FOR COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM059507 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 1999 to 2013
$3.6M
Genetics of Cocaine DependenceR01DA018432 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KRANZLER, HENRY RICHARD · 2006 to 2010
$3.5M
Genetics of Alcohol Dependence in African-AmericansR01AA017535 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GELERNTER, JOEL · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
YALE BIOMEDICAL SUPERCOMPUTER: NEUROSCIENCES10RR019895 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, KENNETH ROBERT · 2004 to 2004
$1.6M
Novel Approaches to Alcoholism Pharmacotherapy and RiskK24AA013736 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KRANZLER, HENRY RICHARD · 2002 to 2012
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS RR19895NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019895NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA013736NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA13736NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011330NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017535NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA11330NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012690NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012849NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018432NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA12690NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA12849NIDA NIH HHS RC2 DA028909NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM59507PHS HHS HSN268200782096C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryGenotype calling from high-throughput platforms such as Illumina and Affymetrix is a critical step in data processing, so that accurate information on genetic variants can be obtained for phenotype-genotype association studies. A number of algorithms have been developed to infer genotypes from data generated through the Illumina BeadStation platform, including GenCall, GenoSNP, Illuminus and CRLMM. Most of these algorithms are built on population-based statistical models to genotype every SNP in turn, such as GenCall with the GenTrain clustering algorithm, and require a large reference population to perform well. These approaches may not work well for rare variants where only a small proportion of the individuals carry the variant. A fundamentally different approach, implemented in GenoSNP, adopts a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based model to infer genotypes of all the SNPs in one individual, making it an appealing alternative to call rare variants. However, compared to the population-based strategies, more SNPs in GenoSNP may fail the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium test. To take advantage of both strategies, we propose a two-stage SNP calling procedure, named the modified mixture model (M(3)), to improve call accuracy for both common and rare variants. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated through applications to genotype calling on a set of HapMap samples used for quality control purpose in a large case-control study of cocaine dependence. The increase in power with M(3) is greater for rare variants than for common variants depending on the model. AVAILABILITY: M(3) algorithm: http://bioinformatics.med.yale.edu/group. CONTACT: name@bio.com; hongyu.zhao@yale.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCase-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGenotypeHapMap ProjectHumansModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID22155947
PMCPMC3268244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.