Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22155821›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Impact of spores on the comparative efficacies of five antibiotics for treatment of Bacillus anthracis in an in vitro hollow fiber pharmacodynamic model.

Arnold Louie, Brian D VanScoy, David L Brown, Robert W Kulawy, Henry S Heine, George L Drusano

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tetrazole-BasedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arnold LouieOrdway Research Institute, Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infections, Albany, New York, USA. arnold.louie@medicine.ufl.edu
Brian D VanScoy
David L Brown
Robert W Kulawy
Henry S Heine
George L Drusano
Albany Research Institute · USUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Yersinia PestisP01AI060908 · NIAID · ORDWAY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI DRUSANO, GEORGE LOUIS · 2005 to 2009
$8.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI060908NIAID NIH HHS P01AI060908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that causes anthrax, is an agent of bioterrorism. The most effective antimicrobial therapy for B. anthracis infections is unknown. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model of B. anthracis was used to compare the efficacies of simulated clinically prescribed regimens of moxifloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem with the "gold standards," doxycycline and ciprofloxacin. Treatment outcomes for isogenic spore-forming and non-spore-forming strains of B. anthracis were compared. Against spore-forming B. anthracis, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem reduced the B. anthracis population by 4 log(10) CFU/ml over 10 days. Doxycycline reduced the population of this B. anthracis strain by 5 log(10) CFU/ml (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P = 0.01 versus other drugs). Against an isogenic non-spore-forming strain, meropenem killed the vegetative B. anthracis the fastest, followed by moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin and then doxycycline. Linezolid offered the lowest bacterial kill rate. Heat shock studies using the spore-producing B. anthracis strain showed that with moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and meropenem therapies the total population was mostly spores, while the population was primarily vegetative bacteria with linezolid and doxycycline therapies. Spores have a profound impact on the rate and extent of killing of B. anthracis. Against spore-forming B. anthracis, the five antibiotics killed the total (spore and vegetative) bacterial population at similar rates (within 1 log(10) CFU/ml of each other). However, bactericidal antibiotics killed vegetative B. anthracis faster than bacteriostatic drugs. Since only vegetative-phase B. anthracis produces the toxins that may kill the infected host, the rate and mechanism of killing of an antibiotic may determine its overall in vivo efficacy. Further studies are needed to examine this important observation.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsBacillus anthracisCiprofloxacinDoxycyclineFluoroquinolonesLinezolidMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityModels, BiologicalMoxifloxacinOxazolidinonesPredictive Value of TestsQuinolinesAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAza CompoundsCiprofloxacinDoxycyclineFluoroquinolonesLinezolidMeropenemMoxifloxacinOxazolidinonesQuinolinesThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID22155821
PMCPMC3294912
OpenAlexW2036704382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.