Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22155273›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2012

Tuning shifts of the auditory system by corticocortical and corticofugal projections and conditioning.

Nobuo Suga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Descending projections to the auditory midbrain: evolutionary considerations.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Cortico-Collicular Amplification Mechanism for Gap Detection.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  13. Functional organization of the primary auditory cortex of the free-tailed bat Tadarida brasiliensis.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  14. GABAJournal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nobuo SugaDepartment of Biology, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. suga@biology.wustl.edu

Funding

NEURAL BASIS OF COMPLEX-SOUND PROCESSINGR01DC000175 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SUGA, NOBUO NONE · 1989 to 2009
$4.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-000175NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000175NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC000175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central auditory system consists of the lemniscal and nonlemniscal systems. The thalamic lemniscal and nonlemniscal auditory nuclei are different from each other in response properties and neural connectivities. The cortical auditory areas receiving the projections from these thalamic nuclei interact with each other through corticocortical projections and project down to the subcortical auditory nuclei. This corticofugal (descending) system forms multiple feedback loops with the ascending system. The corticocortical and corticofugal projections modulate auditory signal processing and play an essential role in the plasticity of the auditory system. Focal electric stimulation - comparable to repetitive tonal stimulation - of the lemniscal system evokes three major types of changes in the physiological properties, such as the tuning to specific values of acoustic parameters of cortical and subcortical auditory neurons through different combinations of facilitation and inhibition. For such changes, a neuromodulator, acetylcholine, plays an essential role. Electric stimulation of the nonlemniscal system evokes changes in the lemniscal system that is different from those evoked by the lemniscal stimulation. Auditory signals ascending from the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic nuclei to the cortical auditory areas appear to be selected or adjusted by a "differential" gating mechanism. Conditioning for associative learning and pseudo-conditioning for nonassociative learning respectively elicit tone-specific and nonspecific plastic changes. The lemniscal, corticofugal and cholinergic systems are involved in eliciting the former, but not the latter. The current article reviews the recent progress in the research of corticocortical and corticofugal modulations of the auditory system and its plasticity elicited by conditioning and pseudo-conditioning.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysConditioning, PsychologicalElectric StimulationHumansNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsThalamus

Identifiers

PMID22155273
PMCPMC3265669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.