Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22155025›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2012

If you build a rare disease registry, will they enroll and will they use it? Methods and data from the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy (DM) and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD).

James E Hilbert, John T Kissel, Elizabeth A Luebbe, William B Martens, Michael P McDermott, Donald B Sanders, Rabi Tawil, Charles A Thornton, Richard T Moxley, Registry Scientific Advisory Committee

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current Therapeutic Approaches in FSHD.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2021
    Review
  11. Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James E HilbertDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. james_hilbert@urmc.rochester.edu
John T Kissel
Elizabeth A Luebbe
William B Martens
Michael P McDermott
Donald B Sanders
Rabi Tawil
Charles A Thornton
Richard T Moxley
Registry Scientific Advisory Committee
University of Rochester Medical Center · USDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER'S RESEARCH ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONUL1RR024160 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PEARSON, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2006 to 2011
$38.7M
Training and Educational CoreU54NS048843 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI THORNTON, CHARLES A · 2003 to 2017
$21.9M
NATIONAL REGISTRY FOR MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY-264002250N01AR002250 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · 2000 to 2004
$437k
MINORITY PREDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMF31AR052274 · NIAMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI DELISSER, KEMESHA L · 2005 to 2005
$16k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024160NHLBI NIH HHS N01 AR052274NIAMS NIH HHS N01 AR002250NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-0-2250NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR-5-2274NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS048843NINDS NIH HHS U54-NS048843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRegistries are becoming increasingly important for rare diseases as experimental therapies develop. This report describes the methodology behind the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy (DM) and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Patients and Family Members to facilitate the development of other rare disease registries. We also highlight data about the pathophysiology and select burdens of DM and FSHD reported at baseline and longitudinally.

methodsThe Registry consists of de-identified, patient reported information collected at baseline and annually and information from review of medical records. Investigators can use the Registry to analyze de-identified data and to facilitate recruitment into clinical studies.

resultsTo date, the Registry has enrolled 1611 members, facilitated 24 studies, and collected data annually for up to 8 years. Genetic test results were obtained in 56.2% of enrollees. Approximately one-third of members used assistive devices and another one-third reported psychological problems at baseline. Wheelchair use was reported for both short and long distances by 7.0% of DM and 18.1% of FSHD members. Approximately 60% of members reported their employment was affected by their disease.

conclusionsStrengths of the Registry include large sample sizes, stringent review of clinical and molecular data, annually updated information, and regular interactions between patients and investigators. Registry data provide new insights into the burdens of DM and FSHD, such as, psychological problems and reduced employment. Opportunities abound for investigators to utilize Registry resources to assess the impact of these and other burdens on health care costs, progression of symptoms, and quality of life.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionRare DiseasesAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMuscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralMyotonic DystrophyRegistriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22155025
PMCPMC3357007
OpenAlexW2008662292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.