Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22154467›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2012

Characterizing microbial communities through space and time.

Antonio Gonzalez, Andrew King, Michael S Robeson, Sejin Song, Ashley Shade, Jessica L Metcalf, Rob Knight

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment ofRevista de biologia tropical · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonio GonzalezDepartment of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Andrew King
Michael S Robeson
Sejin Song
Ashley Shade
Jessica L Metcalf
Rob Knight

Funding

A Quality Assurance, Coordination and Analysis Center for HMPU01HG004866 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, OWEN R · 2008 to 2012
$12.5M
New Tools for Understanding the Composition and Dynamics of Microbial CommunitiesR01HG004872 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KNIGHT, ROB · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004872NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, the study of microbial diversity has mainly been limited to descriptive approaches, rather than predictive model-based analyses. The development of advanced analytical tools and decreasing cost of high-throughput multi-omics technologies has made the later approach more feasible. However, consensus is lacking as to which spatial and temporal scales best facilitate understanding of the role of microbial diversity in determining both public and environmental health. Here, we review the potential for combining these new technologies with both traditional and nascent spatio-temporal analysis methods. The fusion of proper spatio-temporal sampling, combined with modern multi-omics and computational tools, will provide insight into the tracking, development and manipulation of microbial communities.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyBacteriaBiodiversityMetagenomicsModels, BiologicalSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22154467
PMCPMC3311466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.