Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22153753›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2012

The pig: a model for human infectious diseases.

François Meurens, Artur Summerfield, Hans Nauwynck, Linda Saif, Volker Gerdts

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 571 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
571citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

571 citing papers in PubMed, 986 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

511 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

François MeurensInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité de Recherche 1282, Infectiologie Animale et Santé Publique, 37380, Nouzilly (Tours), France. meurens@tours.inra.fr
Artur Summerfield
Hans Nauwynck
Linda Saif
Volker Gerdts
Ghent University · BEInfectiologie Animale et Santé Publique · FRThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An animal model to study human infectious diseases should accurately reproduce the various aspects of disease. Domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) are closely related to humans in terms of anatomy, genetics and physiology, and represent an excellent animal model to study various microbial infectious diseases. Indeed, experiments in pigs are much more likely to be predictive of therapeutic treatments in humans than experiments in rodents. In this review, we highlight the numerous advantages of the pig model for infectious disease research and vaccine development and document a few examples of human microbial infectious diseases for which the use of pigs as animal models has contributed to the acquisition of new knowledge to improve both animal and human health.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalSus scrofaAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCommunicable DiseasesHumansVaccinationVaccinesAnti-Infective AgentsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID22153753
PMCPMC7173122
OpenAlexW1982952028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.