Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22153685›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2012

Trends in cord blood banking.

Isidro Prat Arrojo, María del Carmen Hernández Lamas, Laura Ponce Verdugo, Pascual Rizo Alfaro, Rebeca Rodríguez Pena, Francisco Sánchez Gordo, Pilar Gómez Maldonado, Gracia García Gémar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Good practices in collecting umbilical cord and placental blood.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2016
    Article
  4. The Royan Public Umbilical Cord Blood Bank: Does It Cover All Ethnic Groups in Iran Based on HLA Diversity?Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isidro Prat ArrojoAndalusian Cord Blood Bank, Regional Blood Transfusion Centre, Malaga, Spain. isidro.prat.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
María del Carmen Hernández Lamas
Laura Ponce Verdugo
Pascual Rizo Alfaro
Rebeca Rodríguez Pena
Francisco Sánchez Gordo
Pilar Gómez Maldonado
Gracia García Gémar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUmbilical cord blood (UCB) is a source of hematopoietic precursor cells for transplantation. The creation of UCB banks in 1992 led to the possibility of storing units of UCB for unrelated transplants. The distribution of cell contents in historical inventories is not homogenous and many units are not, therefore, suitable for adults. The aim of this study was to analyse our UCB bank inventory, evaluate the units released for transplantation and calculate the cost of the current process per unit of UCB stored.

methodsThree study periods were defined. In the first period, from January 1996 to January 2006, the total nucleated cell (TNC) count acceptable for processing was 4-6×10(8) and a manual processing system was used. In the second period, from October 2006 to July 2010, processing was automated and the acceptable TNC count varied from 8-10×10(8). In the third period, from January 2009 to June 2010, an automated Sepax-BioArchive procedure was used and the accepted initial TNC count was >10×10(8). Within each period the units were categorised according to various ranges of cryopreserved TNC counts in the units: A, >16.2×10(8); B1, from 12.5-16.1×10(8); B2, from 5.2-12.4×10(8); and C, <5.1×10(8).

resultsThe third period is best representative of current practices, with homogenous TNC acceptance criteria and automated processing. In this period 15.7% of the units were category A and 25.5% were category B. Overall, the mean TNC count of units released for transplantation was 14×10(8) (range, 4.6×10(8) to 36.5×10(8)). The cost of the processed UCB in 2009 was 720.41 euros per unit.

conclusionAn UCB bank should store units of high-quality, in terms of the TNC count of units issued for transplantation, have a training programme to optimise the selection of donors prior to delivery, use similar volume reduction systems and homogenous recovery indices, express its indicators in the same units, use validated analytical techniques, and bear in mind ethnic minorities.

Indexed as

Fetal BloodAdultBlood BankingBlood BanksBlood PreservationCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID22153685
PMCPMC3258995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.