ArticleJournal of biomechanics2012
Mechanical control of spheroid growth: distinct morphogenetic regimes.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universally Conserved Relationships between Nuclear Shape and Cytoplasmic Mechanical Properties in Human Stem Cells.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop a model of transport and growth in epithelio-mesenchymal interactions. Analysis of the growth of an avascular solid spheroid inside a passive mesenchyme or gel shows that sustained volumetric growth requires four generic mechanisms: (1) growth factor, (2) protease, (3) control of cellularity, and (4) swelling. The model reveals a bifurcation delineating two distinct morphogenetic regimes: (A) steady growth, (B) growth arrested by capsule formation in the mesenchyme. In both morphogenetic regimes, growth velocity is constant unless and until a complete capsule forms. Comprehensive exploration of the large parameter space reveals that the bifurcation is determined by just two ratios representing the relative strengths of growth and proteolytic activity. Growth velocity is determined only by the ratio governing growth, independent of proteolytic activity. There is a continuum of interior versus surface growth, with fastest growth at the surface. The model provides a theoretical basis for explaining observations of growth arrest despite proteolysis of surrounding tissue, and gives a quantitative framework for the design and interpretation of experiments involving spheroids, and tissues which are locally equivalent to spheroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.