Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22151558›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2011

The multiple meanings of "wheezing": a questionnaire survey in Portuguese for parents and health professionals.

Ricardo M Fernandes, Brígida Robalo, Cláudia Calado, Susana Medeiros, Ana Saianda, Joana Figueira, Rui Rodrigues, Cristina Bastardo, Teresa Bandeira

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo M FernandesDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte EPE, Lisboa, Portugal. ricardocunhafernandes@clix.pt
Brígida Robalo
Cláudia Calado
Susana Medeiros
Ana Saianda
Joana Figueira
Rui Rodrigues
Cristina Bastardo
Teresa Bandeira
Hospital de Santa Maria · PTCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTHospital de Faro EPE · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost epidemiological studies on pediatric asthma rely on the report of "wheezing" in questionnaires. Our aim was to investigate the understanding of this term by parents and health professionals.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was carried out in hospital and community settings within the south of Portugal. Parents or caregivers self-completed a written questionnaire with information on social characteristics and respiratory history. Multiple choice questions assessed their understanding of "wheezing". Health professionals (physicians, nurses and physiotherapists) were given an adapted version. We used bivariate analysis and multivariate models to study associations between definitions of "wheezing" and participants' characteristics.

resultsQuestionnaires from 425 parents and 299 health professionals were included. The term "wheezing" was not recognized by 34% of parents, more frequently those who were younger (OR 0.4 per 10-year increment, 95% CI 0.3-0.7), had lower education (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.5-7.4), and whose children had no history of respiratory disease (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.5-8.7) (all ORs adjusted). 31% of parents familiar with "wheezing" either did not identify it as a sound, or did not locate it to the chest, while tactile (40%) and visual (34%) cues to identify "wheezing" were frequently used. Nurses reported using visual stimuli and overall assessments more often than physicians (p < 0.01). The geographical location was independently associated with how parents recognized and described "wheezing".

conclusionsDifferent meanings for "wheezing" are recognized in Portuguese language and may be influenced by education, respiratory history and regional terminology. These findings are likely applicable to other non-English languages, and suggest the need for more accurate questionnaires and additional objective measurement instruments to study the epidemiology of wheezing disorders.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPortugal

Identifiers

PMID22151558
PMCPMC3266641
OpenAlexW2091821691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.