Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22151350›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2012

An update review on risk factors and scales for prediction of deep sternal wound infections.

Alessandra Buja, Alessandra Zampieron, Sara Cavalet, Daniele Chiffi, Paolo Sandonà, Angela Vinelli, Tatjana Baldovin, Vincenzo Baldo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Triclosan-coated sutures and sternal wound infections: a prospective randomized clinical trial.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sternotomy Wound Closure: Equivalent Results with Less Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandra BujaDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua 35127, Italy. alessandra.buja@unipd.it
Alessandra Zampieron
Sara Cavalet
Daniele Chiffi
Paolo Sandonà
Angela Vinelli
Tatjana Baldovin
Vincenzo Baldo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infections are the most common nosocomial infections in surgical patients. The preventable and the unmodifiable risk factors for deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) have been amply assessed in the literature. The aim of this review was to describe the results of the numerous published studies to describe all the DSWI risk factors and the scales devised to predict SWI, with a view to providing an update on this issue. A comprehensive search of the Medline and Embase databases was performed (considering studies from January 1995 to April 2011); and a manual search was also conducted using references cited in original publications and relevant review articles. There are several risk factors associated with DSWI, which could be classified in four categories as demographic (e.g. sex and age), behavioural (e.g. smoking and obesity), baseline clinical conditions (e.g. diabetes, hypertension and COPD) and surgical operative risk factors (e.g. duration of operation and emergency operation). Six scales for predicting the risk of DSWI are described in the literature: they vary not only in accuracy but also in ease of application and they are applied at different times (some only preoperatively and others also postoperatively). This study provides a broad update on our knowledge of the risk factors for DSWI and the scales for prediction with a view to improving the management of infections at cardiosurgery units.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionCase-Control StudiesCross InfectionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID22151350
PMCPMC7950851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.