Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22151178›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Benchmarking of the 2010 BioCreative Challenge III text-mining competition by the BioGRID and MINT interaction databases.

Andrew Chatr-Aryamontri, Andrew Winter, Livia Perfetto, Leonardo Briganti, Luana Licata, Marta Iannuccelli, Luisa Castagnoli, Gianni Cesareni, Mike Tyers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew Chatr-AryamontriSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK. a.aryamontri@ed.ac.uk
Andrew Winter
Livia Perfetto
Leonardo Briganti
Luana Licata
Marta Iannuccelli
Luisa Castagnoli
Gianni Cesareni
Mike Tyers

Funding

BioGRID: An open resource for biological interactions and network analysisR01OD010929 · OD · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI KARA DOLINSKI, Mike Tyers · 2012 to 2026
$13.9M
BioGRID: an open resource for biological interactions and network analysisR01RR024031 · NCRR · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI TYERS, MIKE · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F010486/1CIHR FRN 82940NCRR NIH HHS 1R01RR024031NCRR NIH HHS R01RR024031NIH HHS R01 OD010929Telethon GGP09243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vast amount of data published in the primary biomedical literature represents a challenge for the automated extraction and codification of individual data elements. Biological databases that rely solely on manual extraction by expert curators are unable to comprehensively annotate the information dispersed across the entire biomedical literature. The development of efficient tools based on natural language processing (NLP) systems is essential for the selection of relevant publications, identification of data attributes and partially automated annotation. One of the tasks of the Biocreative 2010 Challenge III was devoted to the evaluation of NLP systems developed to identify articles for curation and extraction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) data.

resultsThe Biocreative 2010 competition addressed three tasks: gene normalization, article classification and interaction method identification. The BioGRID and MINT protein interaction databases both participated in the generation of the test publication set for gene normalization, annotated the development and test sets for article classification, and curated the test set for interaction method classification. These test datasets served as a gold standard for the evaluation of data extraction algorithms.

conclusionThe development of efficient tools for extraction of PPI data is a necessary step to achieve full curation of the biomedical literature. NLP systems can in the first instance facilitate expert curation by refining the list of candidate publications that contain PPI data; more ambitiously, NLP approaches may be able to directly extract relevant information from full-text articles for rapid inspection by expert curators. Close collaboration between biological databases and NLP systems developers will continue to facilitate the long-term objectives of both disciplines.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinData MiningGenesNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID22151178
PMCPMC3269943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.