Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22150580›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2012

Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Jaime Benarroch-Gampel, Kristin M Sheffield, Yu-Li Lin, Yong-Fang Kuo, James S Goodwin, Taylor S Riall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Receipt of Colonoscopies among the Insured Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaime Benarroch-GampelDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Kristin M Sheffield
Yu-Li Lin
Yong-Fang Kuo
James S Goodwin
Taylor S Riall
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Understanding Mechanisms of Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer ScreeningR01CA134275 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2008 to 2012
$1.3M
Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention & ControlK05CA134923 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2008 to 2019
$1.0M
Underutilization of Surgical Resection in Patients with Pancreatic CancerK07CA130983 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI RIALL, TAYLOR SOHN · 2008 to 2012
$633k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA134923NCI NIH HHS K05CA134923NCI NIH HHS K07 CA130983NCI NIH HHS K07CA130983NCI NIH HHS L30 CA123901NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134275NCI NIH HHS R01CA134275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. : To determine whether racial/ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use vary by physician availability. DATA SOURCE. : We used 100 percent Texas Medicare claims data for 2003-2007. STUDY DESIGN. : We identified beneficiaries aged 66-79 in 2007, examined racial/ethnic differences in colonoscopy use from 2003 to 2007, and estimated the percentage of white, black, and Hispanic beneficiaries who underwent colonoscopy by level of physician availability and area income. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. : For the 974,879 beneficiaries, colonoscopy use was higher in whites (40.7 percent) compared to blacks (35.0 percent) and Hispanics (28.7 percent, p< .001). For whites, increasing availability of colonoscopists and primary care physicians (PCPs) was associated with higher colonoscopy use. For blacks and Hispanics, colonoscopy use was unchanged or decreased with increases in colonoscopist and PCP availability. In multilevel models, the odds of colonoscopy were 20 percent lower for blacks (OR 0.80, 95 percent CI 0.79-0.82) and 32 percent lower for Hispanics (OR 0.68, 95 percent CI 0.66-0.69) compared to whites; adjusting for availability of colonoscopists or PCPs did not attenuate racial/ethnic disparities. We found greater racial/ethnic disparities in areas with greater colonoscopist and PCP availability. CONCLUSIONS. : Greater area availability of colonoscopists and PCPs is associated with increased use of colonoscopy in whites but decreased use in minorities, resulting in larger racial/ethnic disparities.

Indexed as

AgedBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoHumansLinear ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMedicareMultivariate AnalysisPhysicians, Primary Care

Identifiers

PMID22150580
PMCPMC3243108
OpenAlexW2027356319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.