ArticleAnnals of human genetics2012
TRM: a powerful two-stage machine learning approach for identifying SNP-SNP interactions.
Article in Annals of human genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderating Effects of Genetic Polymorphisms on Improvements in Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Survivors Participating in a 6-Week Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program.Biological research for nursing · 2015Trial
- Machine Learning and Radiogenomics: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Review
- SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Coexpression and expression quantitative trait loci analyses of the angiogenesis gene-gene interaction network in prostate cancer.Translational cancer research · 2016Article
- A Bayesian model for detection of high-order interactions among genetic variants in genome-wide association studies.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Genome wide analysis of flowering time trait in multiple environments via high-throughput genotyping technique in Brassica napus L.PloS one · 2015Article
- Detecting epistasis in human complex traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2014Review
- EPAS1 gene variants are associated with sprint/power athletic performance in two cohorts of European athletes.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- SNP-SNP interaction network in angiogenesis genes associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies have shown that interactions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may play an important role in understanding the causes of complex disease. We have proposed an integrated machine learning method that combines two machine-learning methods-Random Forests (RF) and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS)-to identify a subset of important SNPs and detect interaction patterns more effectively and efficiently. In this two-stage RF-MARS (TRM) approach, RF is first applied to detect a predictive subset of SNPs, and then MARS is used to identify the interaction patterns. We evaluated the TRM performances in four models. RF variable selection was based on out-of-bag classification error rate (OOB) and variable important spectrum (IS). Our results support that RF(OOB) had better performance than MARS and RF(IS) in detecting important variables. This study demonstrates that TRM(OOB) , which is RF(OOB) plus MARS, has combined the strengths of RF and MARS in identifying SNP-SNP interactions in a scenario of 100 candidate SNPs. TRM(OOB) had greater true positive rate and lower false positive rate compared with MARS, particularly for searching interactions with a strong association with the outcome. Therefore, the use of TRM(OOB) is favored for exploring SNP-SNP interactions in a large-scale genetic variation study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.