Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22149708›Full record

ArticleExpert review of vaccines2012

Predictions versus high-throughput experiments in T-cell epitope discovery: competition or synergy?

Claus Lundegaard, Ole Lund, Morten Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of vaccines, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. TCR-ESM: Employing protein language embeddings to predict TCR-peptide-MHC binding.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. CD4NPJ vaccines · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The ADAMTS13Haematologica · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. T Cell Epitope Peptide Therapy for Allergic Diseases.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Immunoregulatory T cell epitope peptides: the new frontier in allergy therapy.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claus LundegaardTechnical University of Denmark-DTU, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Kemitorvet 208, DK 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Ole Lund
Morten Nielsen

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSH266200400006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction methods as well as experimental methods for T-cell epitope discovery have developed significantly in recent years. High-throughput experimental methods have made it possible to perform full-length protein scans for epitopes restricted to a limited number of MHC alleles. The high costs and limitations regarding the number of proteins and MHC alleles that are feasibly handled by such experimental methods have made in silico prediction models of high interest. MHC binding prediction methods are today of a very high quality and can predict MHC binding peptides with high accuracy. This is possible for a large range of MHC alleles and relevant length of binding peptides. The predictions can easily be performed for complete proteomes of any size. Prediction methods are still, however, dependent on good experimental methods for validation, and should merely be used as a guide for rational epitope discovery. We expect prediction methods as well as experimental validation methods to continue to develop and that we will soon see clinical trials of products whose development has been guided by prediction methods.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexProtein BindingResearch DesignEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class II

Identifiers

PMID22149708
PMCPMC3297080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.