Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22148729›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2012

Effects of pH on proteins: predictions for ensemble and single-molecule pulling experiments.

Edward P O'Brien, Bernard R Brooks, D Thirumalai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural modeling supports an interaction between thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. GlutathioneNanoscale advances · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward P O'BrienBiophysics Program, Institute for Physical Science and Technology and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
Bernard R Brooks
D Thirumalai
University of Maryland, College Park · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · US

Funding

Development Of Theoretical Methods For Studying Biological MacromoleculesZIAHL001051 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BROOKS, BERNARD R · 2009 to 2025
$16.2M
Molecular Dynamics Simulations Of Biological MacromoleculesZIAHL001050 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BROOKS, BERNARD R · 2009 to 2025
$12.9M
Computational Approaches to Single Molecule Force SpectroscopyR01GM089685 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI THIRUMALAI, DEVARAJAN · 2010 to 2020
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM089685NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein conformations change among distinct thermodynamic states as solution conditions (temperature, denaturants, pH) are altered or when they are subjected to mechanical forces. A quantitative description of the changes in the relative stabilities of the various thermodynamic states is needed to interpret and predict experimental outcomes. We provide a framework based on the Molecular Transfer Model (MTM) to account for pH effects on the properties of globular proteins. The MTM utilizes the partition function of a protein calculated from molecular simulations at one set of solution conditions to predict protein properties at another set of solution conditions. To take pH effects into account, we utilized experimentally measured pK(a) values in the native and unfolded states to calculate the free energy of transferring a protein from a reference pH to the pH of interest. We validate our approach by demonstrating that the native-state stability as a function of pH is accurately predicted for chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2) and protein G. We use the MTM to predict the response of CI2 and protein G subjected to a constant force (f) and varying pH. The phase diagrams of CI2 and protein G as a function of f and pH are dramatically different and reflect the underlying pH-dependent stability changes in the absence of force. The calculated equilibrium free energy profiles as functions of the end-to-end distance of the two proteins show that, at various pH values, CI2 unfolds via an intermediate when subjected to f. The locations of the two transition states move toward the more unstable state as f is changed, which is in accord with the Hammond-Leffler postulate. In sharp contrast, force-induced unfolding of protein G occurs in a single step. Remarkably, the location of the transition state with respect to the folded state is independent of f, which suggests that protein G is mechanically brittle. The MTM provides a natural framework for predicting the outcomes of ensemble and single-molecule experiments for a wide range of solution conditions.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularPeptidesPlant ProteinsProtein ConformationTemperatureThermodynamicsBacterial Proteinschymotrypsin inhibitor 2IgG Fc-binding protein, StreptococcusPeptidesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22148729
PMCPMC3262061
OpenAlexW2027194630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.