Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22147842›Full record

Trial reportArchives of general psychiatry2011

Trajectories of depression severity in clinical trials of duloxetine: insights into antidepressant and placebo responses.

Ralitza Gueorguieva, Craig Mallinckrodt, John H Krystal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of general psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Early Symptom Trajectories as Predictors of Treatment Outcome for Citalopram Versus Placebo.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2017
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ralitza GueorguievaDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA. ralitza.gueorguieva@yale.edu
Craig Mallinckrodt
John H Krystal
Eli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
Translational Technologies CoreP50AA012870 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal · 2001 to 2026
$43.7M
AMINO ACID NEUROTRANSMITTER DYSREGULATION IN ALCOHOLISMK05AA014906 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRYSTAL, JOHN H. · 2004 to 2008
$918k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139NIAAA NIH HHS 2P50 AA 012870NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA014906NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA 14906NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA012870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe high percentage of failed clinical trials in depression may be due to high placebo response rates and the failure of standard statistical approaches to capture heterogeneity in treatment response.

objectiveTo assess whether growth mixture modeling can provide insights into antidepressant and placebo responses in clinical trials of patients with major depression.

designWe reanalyzed clinical trials of duloxetine to identify distinct trajectories of Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores during treatment. We analyzed the trajectories in the entire sample and then separately in all active arms and in all placebo arms. Effects of duloxetine hydrochloride, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and covariates on the probability of following a particular trajectory were assessed. Outcomes in different trajectories were compared using mixed-effects models.

settingSeven randomized double-blind clinical trials of duloxetine vs placebo and comparator SSRI. Patients A total of 2515 patients with major depression.

interventionsDuloxetine and comparator SSRI. Main Outcome Measure Total score on the HAM-D.

resultsIn the entire sample and in the antidepressant-treated subsample, we identified trajectories of responders (76.3% of the sample) and nonresponders (23.7% of the sample). However, placebo-treated patients were characterized by a single response trajectory. Duloxetine and SSRI did not differ in efficacy, and compared with placebo they significantly decreased the odds of following the nonresponder trajectory. Antidepressant responders had significantly better HAM-D scores over time than placebo-treated patients, but antidepressant nonresponders had significantly worse HAM-D scores over time than the placebo-treated patients.

conclusionsMost patients treated with serotonergic antidepressants showed a clinical trajectory over time that is superior to that of placebo-treated patients. However, some patients receiving these medications did more poorly than patients receiving placebo. These data highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring of medication risks and benefits during serotonergic antidepressant treatment. They should further stimulate the search for biomarkers or other predictors of responder status in guiding antidepressant treatment.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultAntidepressive AgentsData Interpretation, StatisticalDouble-Blind MethodDuloxetine HydrochlorideFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMalePatient DropoutsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSeverity of Illness IndexAntidepressive AgentsDuloxetine HydrochlorideSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID22147842
PMCPMC3339151
OpenAlexW2162946017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.