ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2011
Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.
- The accuracy of panoramic radiography as a screening of bone mineral density in women: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015Pooled it
- A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014Pooled it
- The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health.Contemporary clinical trials · 2013Trial
- AI for Opportunistic Identification of BMD and Bone Microarchitecture: A Narrative Review.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Impact of bone mineral density testing in the national health screening program on osteoporosis-related medical visits and fractures among women.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Secondary fracture prevention after vertebral, femur or pelvic fracture at US academic medical center.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Osteoporosis Using Bone Mineral Density Measurements.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- SHBG and APOA1 as serum biomarkers for low bone mineral density in Mexican postmenopausal women: a random forest-based analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- A statistical model to determine the optimal bone mineral density (BMD) screening schedule in liver transplant recipients.Journal of liver transplantation · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of AI-Based Predictive Models for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women from Panoramic Radiographs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool - Tamil (OKAT-T) in postmenopausal women: A validity and reliability study.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Opportunistic Compression Fracture Screening of Existing Radiographs.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2024Article
- Prevalence of osteoporosis and associated factors among people aged 50 years and older in the Madhesh province of Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Age and sex are excellent predictors of bone complications in patients with type 2 diabetes with no history of osteoporotic fracture or treatment for osteoporosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Article
- Underlying motivations hampering Flemish primary care physicians from overcoming the barriers in osteoporosis care: an EMR-facilitated clinical reasoning study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening With Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for Osteoporosis Classification Using Computed Tomography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe best strategies to screen postmenopausal women for osteoporosis are not clear.
objectiveTo identify the cost-effectiveness of various screening strategies.
designIndividual-level state-transition cost-effectiveness model. DATA SOURCES: Published literature. TARGET POPULATION: U.S. women aged 55 years or older. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Payer.
interventionScreening strategies composed of alternative tests (central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], calcaneal quantitative ultrasonography [QUS], and the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation [SCORE] tool) initiation ages, treatment thresholds, and rescreening intervals. Oral bisphosphonate treatment was assumed, with a base-case adherence rate of 50% and a 5-year on/off treatment pattern. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (2010 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: At all evaluated ages, screening was superior to not screening. In general, quality-adjusted life-days gained with screening tended to increase with age. At all initiation ages, the best strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than $50,000 per QALY was DXA screening with a T-score threshold of -2.5 or less for treatment and with follow-up screening every 5 years. Across screening initiation ages, the best strategy with an ICER less than $50,000 per QALY was initiation of screening at age 55 years by using DXA -2.5 with rescreening every 5 years. The best strategy with an ICER less than $100,000 per QALY was initiation of screening at age 55 years by using DXA with a T-score threshold of -2.0 or less for treatment and then rescreening every 10 years. No other strategy that involved treatment of women with osteopenia had an ICER less than $100,000 per QALY. Many other strategies, including strategies with SCORE or QUS prescreening, were also cost-effective, and in general the differences in effectiveness and costs between evaluated strategies was small. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Probabilistic sensitivity analysis did not reveal a consistently superior strategy. LIMITATIONS: Data were primarily from white women. Screening initiation at ages younger than 55 years were not examined. Only osteoporotic fractures of the hip, vertebrae, and wrist were modeled.
conclusionMany strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis screening are effective and cost-effective, including strategies involving screening initiation at age 55 years. No strategy substantially outperforms another. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Center for Research Resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.