Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22147618›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2012

Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department.

Faisal Nabi, Su Min Chang, Jiaqiong Xu, Elizabeth Gigliotti, John J Mahmarian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Regadenoson provides perfusion results comparable to adenosine in heterogeneous patient populations: a quantitative analysis from the ADVANCE MPI trials.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Trial
  3. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation and triage of chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Trial
  4. Imaging for chest pain in the emergency room: Finding the right gate not the right gatekeeper.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  5. ANMCO-SIMEU Consensus Document: in-hospital management of patients presenting with chest pain.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  6. Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.The British journal of radiology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is regadenoson an appropriate stressor for MPI in patients with left bundle branch block or pacemakers?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Article
  10. Acute chest pain evaluation: is there too much stress on the system?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Article
  11. Acute chest pain of uncertain etiology, the short and long view.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2012
    Article
  12. Patient-centered imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Nuclear cardiology: 2014 innovations and developments.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faisal NabiMethodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center and The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Su Min Chang
Jiaqiong Xu
Elizabeth Gigliotti
John J Mahmarian
Houston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo prospectively assess the clinical value of stress-gated myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for triaging patients admitted through the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain (ACP).

methodsProspective, observational cohort study in 1,576 consecutive patients who were evaluated for ACP over a 29-month period. Stress SPECT was performed within 24 hours of admission from the ED. Analysis included quantification of total and ischemic left ventricular perfusion defect size (PDS). Cardiac events were defined as an acute coronary syndrome during the index hospitalization or in follow-up over 7.3 ± 2.8 months.

resultsEighty-five cardiac events occurred in 77 patients (4.9%). SPECT was abnormal in 135 patients (8.6%) of whom 83 (61.5%) had a reversible defect. Event rates were significantly higher in patients with an abnormal (40%) versus a normal (1.6%) SPECT (P < .0001); and in those with a (1) large (>15%) versus small (≤15%) PDS (50.0% vs 33.7%, P = .05) and (2) large (>10%) versus small (≤10%) ischemic PDS (87.5% vs 42.4%, P < .0001, respectively). SPECT best predicted cardiac events by multivariate analysis. The addition of SPECT to clinical variables significantly improved overall risk prediction (global χ(2) 103.6 vs 207.1, P < .001).

conclusionsStress SPECT can accurately assess risk in a heterogeneous group of patients with ACP of unclear cardiac etiology, and beyond that provided by a clinical risk assessment alone. Our results support the use of stress SPECT for identifying very low-risk ACP patients with normal study results who can be safely discharged home.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChest PainComorbidityEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGated Blood-Pool ImagingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID22147618
OpenAlexW2073166218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.